anonymous
  • anonymous
Let f(x)=10x+(arctanx)^2+2. If g(x) = f-1(x) <- inverse. If g is the inverse function of f, then find the value of g'(2) so far I have got the derivative of g(x) f'(y) = 10y'+2(arctany)y'/1+y^2 and I can't figure out what to do with the y^2
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
dumbcow
  • dumbcow
\[g'(2) = \frac{1}{f'(g(2))}\] \[f'(x) = 10 + \frac{2 \tan^{-1} x}{1+x^{2}}\] g(2) is the solution to f(x) = 2 \[10x + (\tan^{-1} x)^{2} +2 = 2\] \[10x +(\tan^{-1} x)^{2} = 0\] x = 0 http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=10x+%2B+arctan%28x%29%5E2+%3D+0 \[f'(0) = 10 + 2\tan^{-1} 0 / 1+0= 10\] \[g'(2) = \frac{1}{10}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
thank you so much!
dumbcow
  • dumbcow
no problem... sorry i kinda got lost trying to follow your work, i like to just keep everything in terms of x

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
It was my fault should've made it more clearer :(
dumbcow
  • dumbcow
you took the derivative correctly though just looks like you used implicit differentiation ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
yes I did implicit differentiation, but that just got me more confused. Your method was much easier to understand the question :)
dumbcow
  • dumbcow
:)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.