sasogeek
  • sasogeek
differentiate the function \[\ y=(3x+4)^{2} \]\ using the chain rule, i got 6(3x+4) but my book says 6(3x+1) ... who is right?
Mathematics
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
You
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
yup ;)
Mertsj
  • Mertsj
Sue the publisher. You can become rich.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

sasogeek
  • sasogeek
should i keep using that book? it has many examples i want to solve but this one and it's solution just seemed odd
Mertsj
  • Mertsj
Sure as long as you have us to verify your work.
anonymous
  • anonymous
It happens to all books. They sometimes have wrong answers. If they have a lot of incorrect answers you should stop, but otherwise it should be OK.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Every book should come with errata.
EarthCitizen
  • EarthCitizen
typo error mayb
sasogeek
  • sasogeek
well this is the 3rd one, the other two, i checked with my friend's answers, we had the same thing but the book was just wrong, but i've solved more than 200 questions from this book with many right answers other than these 3 so far
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
a book is only viable if\[\frac{\text{errors}}{\text{pages}}\le 0.127\](excess-typo theorem)
anonymous
  • anonymous
Seems like a very unreliable book to me
slaaibak
  • slaaibak
aka less than 1 mistake total in 8 pages :D
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
that's generous!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Or one problem out of 8 per page.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Why study from book OCW single variable is the best introductory calculus course that I have seen.
sasogeek
  • sasogeek
it's just a book with thousands of problem sets and examples on many topics and my teachers recommend it because of it's many examples...
EarthCitizen
  • EarthCitizen
does OCW have intro complex numbers?
anonymous
  • anonymous
For book I like Thomas calculus, it's the best book that I have seen.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Do you mean complex analysis? @EC
asnaseer
  • asnaseer
I would say it's more important for a book to have good explanations of the concepts rather than necessarily have all the answers printed correctly. But I agree, if there are too many mis-printed answers then it can put you off track.
anonymous
  • anonymous
If asnaseer writes a book I will buy it.
EarthCitizen
  • EarthCitizen
yh sound similar
asnaseer
  • asnaseer
sasogeek would be the editor and reject all my mis-printed answers :)
sasogeek
  • sasogeek
it's concepts are laid out correctly and explanations are just okay though i must say, they only seem to mess up with some answers
sasogeek
  • sasogeek
lol asnaseer
EarthCitizen
  • EarthCitizen
yh I guess it's called complex analysis @FFM
anonymous
  • anonymous
haha asnseer and we will ask myin to do the proof-reading
asnaseer
  • asnaseer
no - myininaya should be the illustrator :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
@EC:I never searched, sorry.
sasogeek
  • sasogeek
hahahahaha so true asnaseer
anonymous
  • anonymous
haha :D
EarthCitizen
  • EarthCitizen
yh no p
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/#mathematics there are a couple of 'complex variables' classes I assume those are the same thing
EarthCitizen
  • EarthCitizen
nice link @ TT, new stuffs too

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.