A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 4 years ago
planks quantum theory E= hf, what is f?
Ok i know f is the frequency of the radiation, but when we see it as a particle, what exactly is f?? we cannot use cycles per second, cause thats the definition of a wave, in particle nature, there is no cycle.. but only photons.. so what exactly if f?
anonymous
 4 years ago
planks quantum theory E= hf, what is f? Ok i know f is the frequency of the radiation, but when we see it as a particle, what exactly is f?? we cannot use cycles per second, cause thats the definition of a wave, in particle nature, there is no cycle.. but only photons.. so what exactly if f?

This Question is Closed

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0james!!!!.. !! please answer!

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0f is the frequency of the photon when considering it as a wave. In short, EM radiation is neither exclusively a wave or a particle, but exhibits the behavior of both. This equation is a perfect example of where insisting its one or the other is not productive. A photon is a discrete quanta of energy. It's energy is given by Plank's equation E = hf. You must accept that both the wave and particle properties are here in play.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0but... when we consider this equation we talk about ONLY particle property of light.. and then we use this equation along with e= mc squared.. and de broglie gets the credit for constructing dual nature. how so?..

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0sorry de broglie gets credit for saying even matter should have wave.. however, when we study theories of light, we say plancks quantum equation talks about particle property.. why don't they say.. plancks equation is actually a dual nature itself??

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0With respect to your last question: the reason that the particle nature of light is emphasized with the formulation E = hf is normally because it's introduced to students when discussing the photoelectric effect. This effect very importantly cannot be explained using the wave interpretation of light and is one of the main reasons we have the particle model at all. So the essential interaction that explains the photoelectric effect is this quantized, particlelike nature of the energy of the EM radiation.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So its possible to independently define wave nature of light, but its not possible to do the same for particle nature .. am i right?

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I wouldn't think of it that way. Light is sometimes wave like (e.g., Young double slit experiment); sometimes particle like (e.g., photoelectric effect) The exact relations of energy are of course mixed up, because light is neither one nor the other.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yes .. m still not satisfied.. lets not talk about dual nature for a while, when quantum theory was devised it is supposed to support ONLY PARTICLE nature of light.. so that theory shouldn't have anything to do with wave.. like how EM theory has nothing to do with quantum theory!
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.