A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

anonymous

  • 4 years ago

Nathan studied the properties of a rhombus and a kite and concluded that a rhombus can be called a kite but a kite cannot be called a rhombus. Which statement supports his conclusion? Answer The diagonals in a rhombus must be perpendicular unlike in a kite. The equal sides in a rhombus must be adjacent unlike in a kite. The diagonals in a rhombus must be congruent unlike in a kite. All sides in a rhombus must be equal unlike in a kite.

  • This Question is Closed
  1. anonymous
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    properties of rhombus: (1) its diagonals are perpendicular (2) the equal sides are adjacent

  2. Mertsj
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    All are true except the third one.

  3. anonymous
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    soo which one would yall choose?

  4. Mertsj
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    The last one.

  5. anonymous
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    thank you : )

  6. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.