A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing


  • 4 years ago

How does iodized salt decrease the odds of thyroid disease?

  • This Question is Closed
  1. anonymous
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    The two hormones produced by the thyroid, thyroxine and triiodothyronine, contain substantial amounts of iodine (65% and 58% by mass, respectively). One might guess that if you have insufficient iodine in your diet the thyroid attempts to scavenge the iodine it needs to synthesize these hormones from emergency sources that have undesirable side-effects, eventually leading to permanent damage to the gland. One of the difficulties in appropriate care and maintenance of the body is that it has substantial abilities to compensate for stresses in the short-term: it can tolerate starvation, lack of essential nutrients, dehydration, over-exericse, under-exericse, over-eating, inhaling poisonous fumes, et cetera and so forth for a while -- but not indefinitely. Eventually it will suffer permanent damage. But that means it is NOT always clear from the body's IMMEDIATE reaction whether what you are doing is bad for it, long-term. The body may cope quite well, and the owner (you) may be fooled into thinking what you are doing does no harm. Science suffers the same problem. It can be challenging to do the multi-year, if not multi-decade, studies needed to know whether a given perturbation -- drinking coffee, salt intake, fat intake, sugar intake, hydrogenated oil intake, exercise -- is healthy or unhealthy over the long-term. An interesting illustration is ionizing radiation, the kind you get from radioactive materials. Originally it was though radiation was *good* for you, in part because it definitely seems, in the short-term, to perk a body up -- for example, make it successfully fight off infection. It was known later that very large doses were fatal, but it was only much later after that that it became known that sublethal doses were also not good for you -- could cause cancer, for example. There is still a strong argument going on about whether low doses of radiation are good or bad or neither over the long run. It's very hard to do the kinds of experiments that would find out for sure.

  2. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...


  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.