Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
I know the answer... just want to give you a medal
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
Thanks for the medal! :)
You deserved it. You showed effort :D
always go 1.01 no reason to get anything over that
I don't see a reason to go under it. If I'm using atomic weights in calculations I usually go 4-5 SFs, depending on how many SFs my original data has.
see but i feel that you are taking it out of tolerance of what we can do by hand. so unless you are in a commerical lab there is no reason to have your numbers that exact.
You should end up rounding in your final result anyway, so I guess it's negligible. I just like to have a comfortable number of SFs in my conversion factors. (:. To each his own.
If you calculate the molecular weight of C20H42 using 1.01 for the atomic mass of hydrogen you'll get an answer that is only precise to 3 sig dig. There is nothing wrong with that per se, but it is fairly routine to have lab measurements that are good to 4 sig dig or more, and it would be silly to have the limitation on the precision of your calculations be your willingness to look up the most precisely known value for the atomic weight of hydrogen.