anonymous
  • anonymous
Does string theory state that there isnt anything smaller than "strings"?
Physics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
i think its use ful read it
JamesJ
  • JamesJ
Hm. Aren't the one who's reading "The Elegant Universe". You tell us. It's right there in the book when string theory is introduced.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Oh, i havent got to that part yet..

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

Shayaan_Mustafa
  • Shayaan_Mustafa
no. string are the connections between the atoms. while atoms are the smallest particle. If you say there isnt anything smaller than "strings"? Then this violets the postulates of KMT(Kinetic Molecular Theory)
JamesJ
  • JamesJ
@Shayaan: no, that's completely incorrect in String Theory.
Shayaan_Mustafa
  • Shayaan_Mustafa
@JamesJ. Can you just tell me the definition of string theory? And tell me what does KMT says? Except dark matter, anything in this unverse can't violet KMT.
JamesJ
  • JamesJ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory
Shayaan_Mustafa
  • Shayaan_Mustafa
I know this link. Even during the course of Quantum physics we have made thesis in regarding this theory. Try to understand what i replied to Inopeki. Thnx
JamesJ
  • JamesJ
I'm sorry, but in String Theory, strings are not "the connections between atoms" and it most definitely not the case that "atoms are the smallest particle"!! Even in standard quantum mechanics that last statement is simply no where near true.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Sorry, even i know that.
Shayaan_Mustafa
  • Shayaan_Mustafa
sorry i was busy and late reply. Here by connection i meant string are the closed loops.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I was talking about the "atoms are the smallest particles" thing.
Shayaan_Mustafa
  • Shayaan_Mustafa
yes atoms. not strings.
anonymous
  • anonymous
...
anonymous
  • anonymous
Im sorry, have i not understood this? Aren't electrons,muons,gluons,positrons etc. the smallest particles? If quarks count as particles then they are probably the smallest.
Shayaan_Mustafa
  • Shayaan_Mustafa
ohh dear. these are the fundamental particles by which atom is made. but matter is compose of atoms. Atoms are the smallest particles.(Dalton's atomic theory.)
anonymous
  • anonymous
Well then i have misunderstood this whole thing.. James, is this correct?
Shayaan_Mustafa
  • Shayaan_Mustafa
you have to make base of your fundamentals in order to study Quantum mechanics.
JamesJ
  • JamesJ
@inopeki, when next we're on together we'll talk. In a word: no.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.