anonymous
  • anonymous
Am I a wisecrack or a fool? "Show that if \(a\), \(b\), \(m\), and \(n\) are integers such that \(m>0\), \(n>0\), \(n|m\), and \(a\equiv b (\mod m)\), then \(a\equiv b (\mod n)\)." Proof: By definition, we have that \(a\equiv b (\mod m)\implies m|(a-b)\). Since \(n|m\), it follows that \(n|(a-b)\). Therefore, \(a\equiv b (\mod n)\). \(\blacksquare\) This is too short to be true. What do you think?
Mathematics
chestercat
  • chestercat
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
Seems true to me.
anonymous
  • anonymous
If you want to make it longer, you can add an intermediate step to prove that if \(n|m\) and \(m|k\) then \(n|k\).
anonymous
  • anonymous
Although I don't see any good reason for doing that! :D

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
I mean, I can always write a more rigorous proof, but I don't know if this one would be any better than the one above: Proof: By definition, we have that \(a\equiv b\mod m\implies a=b+km\), \(\exists k\in\mathbb{Z}\). Since \(n|m\), we have \(m=cn\), \(\exists c\in\mathbb{Z}\). Substituting yields \(a=b+km\implies a=b+kcn\). But because \(kc\in\mathbb{Z}\), it follows that \(a\equiv b\mod n\). \(\blacksquare\)
anonymous
  • anonymous
Both of them look good to me. The second one is more rigorous as you said, which is better I think.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Thank you. :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
You're welcome! :)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.