A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 4 years ago
Q: Calculate the energy of a wavelength using this formua: E=h*f
Key:
E= energy
H= Planck's constant (6.626*10^34) units:js
f= frequency
Frequecny formula: 3.0*10^8 m/s (speed of light)/ wavelength (630nm)
*NOTE: I've already done this, I just need someone to check my work. This is what I did:
I found the frequency by: 3.0*10^8 m/s divided by 630nm.
I got 476190.4762 for frequency (please help with units, I don't know how to put them together)
Then I multiplied plancks constant with the frequency:
6.626*10^34 * 476190.4762 to get:
15361905 (rounded) as the energy.
anonymous
 4 years ago
Q: Calculate the energy of a wavelength using this formua: E=h*f Key: E= energy H= Planck's constant (6.626*10^34) units:js f= frequency Frequecny formula: 3.0*10^8 m/s (speed of light)/ wavelength (630nm) *NOTE: I've already done this, I just need someone to check my work. This is what I did: I found the frequency by: 3.0*10^8 m/s divided by 630nm. I got 476190.4762 for frequency (please help with units, I don't know how to put them together) Then I multiplied plancks constant with the frequency: 6.626*10^34 * 476190.4762 to get: 15361905 (rounded) as the energy.

This Question is Closed

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0COULD SOMEBODY PLEASE CHECK MY WORK, I have a lab report and I really want to get this right. :(

phi
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1you should use scientific notation when doing this problem 630 nm = 630 x 10^9 m = 6.3 x 10^7 m

phi
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1f= 3.0*10^8/6.3*10^7 = 4.76*10^14 Hertz (1/sec)

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So my error is not putting it in scientific notation?

phi
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1E= 6.626*10^34 Js * 4.76*10^14 1/sec = 3.15*10^19 Joules

phi
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I would not say error. Just very very bad way to do it. (too ugly)

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I won't say I'm not still confused, but thank you for showing me the "easier" way. :D

phi
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I did not say it was easy. Just easier. First, you change 620 nm (nanometers) to meters. google for definition. you get as above. see if you can follow the arithmetic
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.