A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

anonymous

  • 4 years ago

Based on fossilized evidence, there are scientific claims made about the evolution of certain species. If a scientist studying the fossils of a specific species had a hypothesis other than what was currently accepted, what steps should be taken to have the alternative hypothesis considered? a. The scientist should publish the alternative hypothesis in a popular magazine to gain public support. b. If an alternative hypothesis sounds plausible, it could be used in place of the original hypothesis. c. It is useful to test alternative hypotheses and know that they are incorrect.

  • This Question is Closed
  1. anonymous
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    d. Since the original hypothesis is untestable given the circumstances, another one is more likely to be correct.

  2. blues
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Are you guessing D?

  3. anonymous
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    no that is another choice

  4. blues
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Which do you think it is?

  5. anonymous
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i think is b

  6. blues
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    In the long term, that might happen. But first I think the alternative hypothesis needs to be tested. Scientists are very conservative about theories: a new hypothesis is deemed 'incorrect' until it has been thoroughly tested and demonstrated to be better than the old one. So I think the answer is probably C. Make sense?

  7. anonymous
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yea so first test it then if not make another hypothesis?

  8. blues
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    First test it. If it doesn't pass the test - that is, if the data is not sufficient to reject the established hypothesis - then keep the old hypothesis. If it does pass the test, reject the established hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

  9. anonymous
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I understand, thanks

  10. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.