Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

- anonymous

This is a really stupid question, but is the set \(\{0\}\) compact?

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions.

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions

- anonymous

This is a really stupid question, but is the set \(\{0\}\) compact?

- schrodinger

See more answers at brainly.com

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- anonymous

I think it is, since the only sequence in it would be \((0,0,0,...)\) and its subsequences would be the same.

- JamesJ

In the real numbers, any set that is bounded and closed is compact. Hence any finite set is compact.

- anonymous

Just to give you a hint for further research: The theorem JamesJ is using is called the "Heine Borel" theorem if I'm not mistaken. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heine%E2%80%93Borel_theorem
You could also argue that the topology induced by the usual topology on R on a singleton set (like \(\{0\}\)) is the trivial topology consisting only of the point itself and the empty set. Therefore the only open cover of the singleton subspace is the singleton itself which is countable. This proves compactness directly by its definition: Any open cover of a singleton set has the singleton set itself as a countable subcover.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.