A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
 3 years ago
This reaction was monitored as a function of time:
AB > A + B
A plot of 1/[AB] versus time yields a straight line with slope of 0.055/M*s.
a) What is the value of the rate constant (k) for this reaction t this temperature?
b) Write the rate law for the reaction.
c) What is the halflife when the initial concentration is 0.55M?
d) If the initial concentration of AB is 0.250M, and the reaction mixture initially contains no products, what are the concentrations of A and B after 75s?
 3 years ago
This reaction was monitored as a function of time: AB > A + B A plot of 1/[AB] versus time yields a straight line with slope of 0.055/M*s. a) What is the value of the rate constant (k) for this reaction t this temperature? b) Write the rate law for the reaction. c) What is the halflife when the initial concentration is 0.55M? d) If the initial concentration of AB is 0.250M, and the reaction mixture initially contains no products, what are the concentrations of A and B after 75s?

This Question is Closed

Xishem
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Well, the integrated rate law for a secondorder reaction written in slopeintercept form when concentration is being plotted versus time is this... \[\frac{1}{[AB]}=kt+\frac{1}{[AB]_0}\]The slope here would be k, the rate constant. That should give you the answer for number one.

smorlaz
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Thanks, I was wondering about that but wasn't sure. I knew it was second order but forgot that the slope would be k. That's what I get from insomnia.

Xishem
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1The rate law will take a general form of this...\[Rate=k[AB]^x\]We know that the exponent must be 2, and we already know the value of the rate constant, k...\[Rate=0.055[AB]^2\]I'm not sure about the rate constant being negative, though. It seems strange and counterintuitive. It would basically mean that if there is any positive amount of reactant that the reaction would produce reactant. Maybe someone else who knows more about it could input, but I don't think the slope of the graph should be negative, ever. It can be negative for a firstorder reaction, but that's because the equation is...\[\ln([A])=kt+\ln([A]_0)\]Someone else may have to help you with it in this case, because a negative k doesn't make sense to me.

smorlaz
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Thanks for your help though. I did get that far but the negative answer and slope doesn't make sense to me so far. I'm trying to figure out part d right now but am a it stuck.

Xishem
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Well, using the integrated rate law equation, you can plug in initial concentration, k, and t to find the concentration after t seconds. And you know that for every mole of reactant that is used you'll produce 1 mole of each of the reactants...\[1AB \rightarrow 1A+1B\]Does that help?

Xishem
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.11 mole of each of the products*

smorlaz
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Hmm, yes. It does help. I know that much. Thanks for your help. I shouldn't have changed majors since it's been 4 years since I've used Chemistry. I take it that after you find 1/[AB]subscript t, you can use that to find molarity of [AB]t. Then, you use that value to find [A] and [B] after 75 seconds? I could be wrong but that's my intuition speaking.

Xishem
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Yes. For example, if the concentration of reactant changes from 0.250M to 0.100M after 75 seconds, then the concentrations of the products will be equal to the difference. In this case, 0.150M.

smorlaz
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Hmm, I got a negative answer for 1/[AB]t which throws me off. Units should be in /M*s so that sets me off for how to find [A] and [B] since we don't have a given volume to cancel out units of /M.

Xishem
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1The negative k value throws this off, yes. You don't need a volume unit here. Given that the volume of the resulting solution is the same (which it will be), the change in concentration of reactant will be the same as the change in concentration of the product. If you have 1 mole of decomposes according to this reaction, you'll have 1 mole of each of the products, yes? And since the volume of the solution stayed the same, the concentrations will therefore be the same. Make sense? You'll need to figure out what the negative rate constant is all about first, though.

smorlaz
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yes, that makes sense. I'm still trying to figure out what the negative rate constant is all about but am still stumped on that part. I do appreciate all your help though.
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.