Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

myininaya

  • 2 years ago

True/False?: Let V and W be vector spaces. Let L:V->W be a linear map. If kerL=0, then L is a bijection.

  • This Question is Closed
  1. myininaya
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I think it is false but I need a counterexample to show me that. lol

  2. myininaya
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    So kerL=0 is the elements v in V such that L(v)=0

  3. myininaya
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    So we need to show that for some mapping L that L is not a bijection Remember a bijection has the following properties: A )x,y in V, L(x)=L(y) implies x=y (injective) B )if for every w in W there exists at least one v in V such that L(v)=w (surjective)

  4. myininaya
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    So we know that L is injective. So L fails the surjective part of the definition of bijective. Assume that ker(L) = 0. If L(v1) = L(v2), then linearity of L tells that L(v1 - v2) = 0. Then ker(L) = 0 implies v1-v2 = 0, which shows that v1=v2 as desired.

  5. myininaya
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @jamesj @Zarkon I hope I don't bother you guys too much...I can't figure out such a function for my counterexample. You don't have to answer if you don't want to but of course you already knew that. lol

  6. JamesJ
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    If the kernel is non-zero the the dimensionality of the image of V, L(V) is equal to V. This tells us intuitively that the map is 1:1. To formalize it, we need two things, as you observe a) surjectivity b) injectivity a) is trivial, and notice that L(V) need NOT equal W Now using your argument above, you've shown the L is injective, i.e., 1:1, because if L(v1) = L(v2), then v1 = v2. Hence indeed L is a bijection.

  7. myininaya
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    So that is why I couldn't think of a function that fails the surjective part becacuse the statement was true. lol

  8. myininaya
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Thanks JamesJ.

  9. JamesJ
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    sure

  10. Zarkon
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Wouldn't we need to know the dimensions of V and W in order to determine if it was indeed surjective?

  11. JamesJ
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    I'm just saying it surjective onto its image and the sense of a function being a bijection being just one to one and onto. If the question is: is the map L a bijection *between V and W*, yes, then clearly we need that dim(V) = dim(W) in the finite case.

  12. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.