anonymous
  • anonymous
Could someone help me with a problem involving units of lbm and lbf?
Physics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'd be glad to assist.
anonymous
  • anonymous
A bowling ball weighs 16 pounds-force (lbf) on earth, but only 7.6 lbf on Jupiter. What is the acceleration of gravity on Jupiter in meters/second? What is its mass on earth in lbm? What is the mass of the ball in kilograms on Jupiter?
anonymous
  • anonymous
I need help with the second and third questions.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
First off, I want to thank you for putting so much detail into your answer. This looks like I'm going to have to speak with my teacher immediately. B/c he said that the ball would be 16lbm (1kg/2.2lbm) = 7.25kg. This is why I kept getting so confused because I calculated 0.5 lbm on Jupiter, but then I keep hearing that 1lbf = 1lbm b/c you can convert from 1lbm to slugs, and then multiply that by the gravitational constant (whether it be on earth or some other planet).
anonymous
  • anonymous
Seriously... I HATE the English system. :-|
anonymous
  • anonymous
Who knows... maybe my instructor just screwed up. This is really bugging me. I have no problems with the metric system, but the English system is so *** backwards.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I hate it too. I should know it better (being an engineering student and all). I looked into it some more and my approach is wrong. \(1 lb_F = 1 lb_m\) on earth. So let's redefine \(lb_F\) as\[1 lb_F = 1 lb_m \cdot {g \over g_m}\]where \(g_m\) is the gravitational acceleration on earth. Therefore, the mass of the object on earth is, in-fact, \(16 lb_m\). To find the acceleration on Jupiter, let's solve the following equation for g. \[7.6 [lb_F] = 16 \cdot {g \over 32.17}\]g can readily be converted to m/s^2.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I guess what this means is the only lbm we can go off of is the one that we find on earth.
anonymous
  • anonymous
B/c you and I found two different lbms... one on earth and one on Jupiter which we know wouldn't be the case.
anonymous
  • anonymous
The mass will be the same. \[1 lb_f = 1 slug \cdot a\]\[1 slug = {1 lb_m \over 32.17}\]Therefore,\[7.6 lb_f = {16 \over 32.17} slug \cdot g_J\]which is equal to\[7.6 lb_f = 16 lb_m \cdot {g_J \over 32.17}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
On earth this is expressed as\[16 lb_f = 16 lb_m \cdot {32.17 \over 32.17}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
Therefore, your teachers conversion is correct. \[x kg = 16 \cdot 0.45\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm still studying what you wrote...
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'll print out that 3rd to last thing your wrote and just keep looking it over. Thank you for really going over this with me. It's extremely confusing. But your explanation is making more and more sense as I let it sink in. And I'm sure it'll be even clearer tomorrow. One more medal for you if I could give it.
anonymous
  • anonymous
This is not easy to understand, it got me confused earlier. I have to study the principles every time I'm presented with an english units problem. Keep in mind that Newton's second law doesn't hold when we use pound-mass. \[F \ne [lb_m] \cdot a\]Instead, \[F = [slug] \cdot a\]Therefore, \[F = \left [ {lb_m \over 32.17} \right ] \cdot a\]since\[1 [slug] = \left [1 lb_m \over g_m \right] = \left [ 1 lb_m \over 32.17 \right]\] I might recommend just converting to slugs since we can use slugs just like we use kgs.
anonymous
  • anonymous
My apologies for the initial confusion.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Oh no, it's okay! My boyfriend's a mechanical engineer and took this class a few years ago... and he couldn't remember how to do stuff regarding British units. My dad couldn't and he's an engineer. So I wasn't expecting someone to just "get it" immediately. That's the nature of this system.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.