Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

Jadeoconnor465

  • 4 years ago

isabella works for an environmental safety group. Her group wants to answer the question "to what lengths must we go to protect plants and animals?" Why is her group's research question flawed?

  • This Question is Closed
  1. Jadeoconnor465
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    These are the answers choices: A.The question is based on their bias as members of an environmental group. B.The study can only be based on observation with this question. C.They are trying to answer an ethical question, not a scientific one. D.They will never be able to determine a means of protecting plants and animals. I really need help.

  2. TranceNova
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Wow I see what you mean, that is a tough question. Lets see.. A. well this is pretty true, not sure if its a flaw though. B. Surely studies based on observations still count.. I hope. C. Its both ethical and scientific.. not sure about C. D. I suppose in practice they would never determine a means to protect them..but is that a flaw? You're going to have to make you're choice on this one, probably best to talk to your teacher :)

  3. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy