anonymous
  • anonymous
Let (G,∗) be a binary structure that has the following properties: 1) The binary operation ∗ is associative. 2) There exists an element e∈G such that for all a∈G, e∗a=a (Existence of left Identity). 3) For all a∈G, there exists b∈G such that b∗a=e (existence of left inverses) Prove that (G,∗) is a group.
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
All you need to show, is that it also has a right identity, and a right inverse.
anonymous
  • anonymous
yea,,, I have hourssss trying to :(
anonymous
  • anonymous
That's true as well for non-Abelian groups, right?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
Wait, yes it is. I was derping; I forgot the exact definition of Abelian for a second.
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
It is true for non-abelian groups too, but I'm starting to see why he was having problems. I keep getting that statements that use circular logic.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I know that in order to prove the right identity i use some how my left inverse... but i keep getting stuck
anonymous
  • anonymous
Man, I'm too sleepy for this. :(
anonymous
  • anonymous
bad reference... please... i have 3 nights with no sleep :(
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm running in circles, and I can't tell if I'm just falling for a trap, or if I'm just derping because I'm sleepy.
anonymous
  • anonymous
:(
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
According to the always helpful wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_group_theory, Let \(y\) be the inverse of \(a*x\), and \(x\) be the inverse of \(a\). Then \[e=y*(a*x)\]\[e=y*(a*(e*x))\]\[e=y*(a*((x*a)*x))\]\[e=y*(a*(x*(a*x)))\]\[e=y*((a*x)*(a*x))\]\[e=(y*(a*x)*a)*x\]\[e=e*(a*x)\]\[e=a*x\]Thus we have a right inverse also.
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
As for right identity, let \(x\) be the inverse of \(a\). Then\[a*e=a*(x*a)\]\[a*e=(a*x)*a\]\[a*e=e*a\]\[a*e=a\]So we also have right identities.
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
That took some time to take apart and figure out exactly what was going on.
anonymous
  • anonymous
im still trying to understand the inverses
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
Any particular step in that proof?
anonymous
  • anonymous
well,, im trying to understand step by step... let me see if i get stuck
anonymous
  • anonymous
Woops, I tried proving it backwards using the right inverse. I feel dumb.
anonymous
  • anonymous
waittt
anonymous
  • anonymous
if x is the inverse of a and if we have left inverse the will be (x*a) nooo (a*x)
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
If that was unclear, it means that \(x*a=e\).
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
And we want to show that \(a*x=e\) as well.
anonymous
  • anonymous
yea... but u are using the right one
anonymous
  • anonymous
yea but you can apply that statement like its true.. u want to get that statement
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
In the proof, using meticulous use of associativity, it shows that if \(y*(a*x)=e\), and \(x*a=e\), then \(a*x=e\). Both \(y\) and \(x\) are left inverses of \(a*x\) and \(a\) respectively.
anonymous
  • anonymous
but my understanding is that u cant just say x*a=e=a*x.. u have to get the answer
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
We didn't just say that. By converting \(x\) into \(e*x\) and \(e\) into \(x*a\) (true by hypothesis), we can reorganize our terms to prove that \(x*a=a*x=e\)
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok let em check again
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
I need to go to bed now, but if you continue to have questions, feel free to ask and I'll get back to you tomorrow.
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok thanks you very much I kind of getting it..

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.