anonymous
  • anonymous
Which of the following best explains what would happen if there were no primary consumers in an ecosystem?
Biology
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
POSSIBLE ANSWERS: A) The population of producers would increase, while carnivores would lose their energy source. B) The population of producers would increase, while more energy would be transferred from the secondary consumers to the producers. C) The population of producers would decrease, while herbivores would adapt to using heterotrophs as an energy source. D) The population of producers would decrease, while less energy would be transferred from autotrophs to heterotrophs.
anonymous
  • anonymous
A

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.