Natalie studied the properties of a square and a rhombus and concluded that a square can be called a rhombus but a rhombus cannot be called a square. Which statement supports her conclusion?
Answer
The sides in a square must be congruent unlike in a rhombus.
The diagonals in a square must be congruent unlike in a rhombus.
The opposite sides in a square must be parallel unlike in a rhombus.
The diagonals in a square must be perpendicular unlike in a rhombus.

Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

b

b

thank you p.s nice cat

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.