anonymous
  • anonymous
...the kind of watch that does not need a battery to operate, 'neither does it require winding to operate'... any grammatical error in the 2nd line? i feel weird after reading it
Writing
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yes, that "neither" is out of place. It ought, at the very least, to be "nor." ...the kind of watch that does not need a battery to operate, nor does it require winding to operate... It's still somewhat awkward. You might also do this, getting rid of that double phrase "to operate" -- ...the kind of watch that does not need a battery, nor does it require winding, to operate... Or this, trimming even further -- ...the kind of watch that requires neither a battery nor winding to operate...
anonymous
  • anonymous
owh wow. okay thx =D
anonymous
  • anonymous
Sure thing. :)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.