• anonymous can anyone explain part b)? The answers are there but I don't understand where all the fractions are coming from. And why is both moving to left? Wouldn't that make this inelastic collision?
  • Stacey Warren - Expert
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at in under 10 minutes. Go to now for free help!
  • Mani_Jha
If both move together after the collision, it doesn't mean that the collision is elastic. An elastic collision just means that the body is able to regain its original shape completely after collision. If the second mass(pendulum) were not attached to the string, it would have not moved together with the other mass. But since it is attached to the string, it is compelled to move forward, and so is the other mass. They move together only for an instant, because just after that, the mass attached to the pendulum moves up, while the other mass moves forward linearly. The second equation is just conservation of linear momentum. Clear now?
  • Mani_Jha
*inelastic at the end of my first sentence.
  • anonymous
yep thanks

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.