anonymous
  • anonymous
If you had to prove the Pythagorean Theorem to another person, which proof would you use? Why?
Mathematics
chestercat
  • chestercat
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

saifoo.khan
  • saifoo.khan
Use something from youtube.com
amistre64
  • amistre64
euclid, cause its like got pictures
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
|dw:1333073135480:dw| the areas of a^2 and b^2 = c^2

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

amistre64
  • amistre64
|dw:1333073168462:dw|
lgbasallote
  • lgbasallote
id probably use the sin-cos-tan
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
get them to draw various right angled triangles and to measure the sides and calculate the areas
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
can you explain that a little bit amistre64
anonymous
  • anonymous
Find the area of the big square (a+b)^2 and subtract the area of the little triangles 4*(a*b/2) to get the area of c^2
anonymous
  • anonymous
The file attached to my original post is better, but this should give you the idea |dw:1333073644418:dw|
amistre64
  • amistre64
can i explain it? hmmm, id have to bring up how euclid explained it really
amistre64
  • amistre64
http://aleph0.clarku.edu/~djoyce/java/elements/bookI/propI47.html
amistre64
  • amistre64
i think prop 47 is worked up to so that you would actually have to define certain aspects before a proper proof could be established as prop 47 spells out

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.