Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

If you had to prove the Pythagorean Theorem to another person, which proof would you use? Why?

I got my questions answered at in under 10 minutes. Go to now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer


To see the expert answer you'll need to create a free account at Brainly

Use something from
euclid, cause its like got pictures
|dw:1333073135480:dw| the areas of a^2 and b^2 = c^2

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

id probably use the sin-cos-tan
get them to draw various right angled triangles and to measure the sides and calculate the areas
can you explain that a little bit amistre64
Find the area of the big square (a+b)^2 and subtract the area of the little triangles 4*(a*b/2) to get the area of c^2
The file attached to my original post is better, but this should give you the idea |dw:1333073644418:dw|
can i explain it? hmmm, id have to bring up how euclid explained it really
i think prop 47 is worked up to so that you would actually have to define certain aspects before a proper proof could be established as prop 47 spells out

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question