anonymous
  • anonymous
I can't understand this proof: =/
Mathematics
katieb
  • katieb
See more answers at brainly.com
katieb
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
Sorry Turing, I still don't get it.
Hero
  • Hero
Level of difficulty increased when put in espanol

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm writting the traslation Hero. wait.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Let P a poin outside the line XY; PO a line perpendicular from P to XY, and PZ another line drawn from P to XY. Prove that PZ is not perpendicular to XY.
anonymous
  • anonymous
TuringTest already helped me to prove it(He did it actually) but the thing is that I can't understand the proof that is given in the book.
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
what is "recto" ?
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
when it says "son rectos"
anonymous
  • anonymous
recto = 90 degrees
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
that's what I thought
anonymous
  • anonymous
I don't get the line before the last one.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Ohh I think I get it =)!
anonymous
  • anonymous
The number 34 says. un angulo recto es la mitad de un angulo de lados colineales.
anonymous
  • anonymous
It was proved that the angle P'ZP has not colineal sides. and then proved that angle OZP is half angle P'ZP.
anonymous
  • anonymous
It proved that OZP is half of an angle that is not a 90ยบ angle.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I think I understand now but I'm still incapable of doing that kind of proofs by myself. =/
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
It seems so excessive. I couldn't do the proof myself like this, you saw my way. I'm not so sure I care to do proofs like this frankly :P
anonymous
  • anonymous
What do you mean by excesive?
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
too much more work than is necessary/needed
anonymous
  • anonymous
Do you think I should study from another book instead?
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
depends what you want to learn I guess
anonymous
  • anonymous
Well I want to learn geometry and learn how to make proofs.
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
then I guess this is the kind of stuff you should be learning I'm not that rigorous myself good for you though ;)
anonymous
  • anonymous
Well thank you then =). I hope to have learn by the end of this year. If everything goes right.
amistre64
  • amistre64
one problem i see is that it is sideways
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm sorry amistre64. =/
anonymous
  • anonymous
I couldn't fix that quickly
amistre64
  • amistre64
i think this is a rendition of euclids elements
anonymous
  • anonymous
a rendition?
anonymous
  • anonymous
what is that?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Actually I wanted to study Ecuclid's elements. But I started doing this book before. So I don't want to start again.
amistre64
  • amistre64
http://aleph0.clarku.edu/~djoyce/java/elements/bookI/propI12.html they might give you some insight into it tho
anonymous
  • anonymous
Wooww thank you amistre64!
amistre64
  • amistre64
de nada

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.