anonymous
  • anonymous
I would appreciate some help with this proof: Let \[CD\perp AB, FD > DE\], prove that \[CF>CE\]
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
triangle similarity. FD/DR=CF/CE if fd>dr, cf is bound to be >ce
anonymous
  • anonymous
sorry @GChamon what is DR?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
sry! typo. DE
anonymous
  • anonymous
wait a sec... you still need to prove the similarity. it doesn't say anything else?
anonymous
  • anonymous
What kind of similarity did you use?
anonymous
  • anonymous
cuz u get same angle, 90º, same side dc, but u still need another angle/side to prove the similarity
anonymous
  • anonymous
sorry dude, no need for similarity, it is basic triangle properties. they (triangle CFD and CDE) both share same side CD and same angle 90º. you have then that a^2=b^2+c^2 lets say they both share same 'c' side. b(CFD)>b(CDE ,<=> a(CFD)>a(CDE)
anonymous
  • anonymous
in a nutshell, the length of CF is dependent on length of FD, where the longer CF is the longer FD is.
anonymous
  • anonymous
that also applies to the other triangle
anonymous
  • anonymous
It's kind of difficult to understand for me. But let me think about it.
anonymous
  • anonymous
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
This is what I have until now
anonymous
  • anonymous
i find your steps a little reduntant. try to observe the fact that they both share the same side and have 90º angles. you can relate each other using a^2=b^2+c^2
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm going to do it the way you're suggesting. But I just wanted to know if the work I did makes sense and indeed is correct?
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1333245486002:dw| b^2+c^2=a^2 b^2+c'^2=a'^2 if b is the same in both equations, the longer the c, the longer the a. if c>c', a>a'
anonymous
  • anonymous
about your resolution, i couldn't really tell if it was going to the right direction, could work, but i am not sure. anyway mathematically it is correct
anonymous
  • anonymous
I understand your approach, but could you express it in a more formal way.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm trying to do it but I can't figure out how to get from c>c' to a>a'
anonymous
  • anonymous
I set up this equation \[a^2-c^2=a'^{2}-c'^{2}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
If two triangles have two angles equal to two angles respectively, and one side equal to one side, which may be either the sides between the equal angles or the sides opposite one of them, then the remaining sides will equal the remaining sides (those that are opposite the equal angles), and the remaining angle will equal the remaining angle.Let ABC, DEF be two triangles in which angles B and C are equal respectively to angles E and F; let the adjoining side BC be equal to the adjoining side EF; then AB will equal DE, AC will equal DF, and angle A will equal angle D. The proof is not really difficult but it involves two cases; this one for when the adjoining sides BC, EF are equal, and another for when the sides opposite equal angles are equal: sides AB, DE; hence the proof is lengthy. Each case is proved by the indirect method, and rests ultimately on S.A.S.
Callisto
  • Callisto
Not sure if it is correct but hope you understand it
1 Attachment

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.