A community for students. Sign up today!
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing

This Question is Closed

.Sam.
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4\[\huge 7.3^{x1}+53^{x+1}=0\]

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0is that 7*3^(x1) or (7.3)^(x1)

lgbasallote
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0do tell me..does this involve canceling 3^x1 the solution i thought had that..

Ishaan94
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0\[3^x = \frac{15}{2}\] \[x = \log_3 \frac{15}2\]

.Sam.
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4@Ishaan94 that's true if the decimal was "dot" *

Ishaan94
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Oh, my bad... so it's \[(7.3)^{x1} + 53^{x+1}=0\]Hmm Now I feel stupid :/

Ishaan94
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0campbell decimal point, 7.3 = 73/10

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0its an annoying problem. whats the bloody solution?

anonymoustwo44
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ln(a+b) is not the same as lna +lnb

Ishaan94
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0You can't take log like that

Ishaan94
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think 7.3 has something to do with 5, we should try to use 5

experimentX
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0wolf's answer http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=7.3%5E%28x1%29%2B53%5E%28x%2B1%29%3D0

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0why did he say this is easy problem

karatechopper
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0hhe says its easy and im still stuck on first step, can i switch signs?

karatechopper
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i meant he, meaning sam

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i think this could somehow become a quadratic, with the right substitution

experimentX
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i don't think general method we use would work

experimentX
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0how do you solve this 2^x  x = 2

anonymoustwo44
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think we could only use newtons method......

anonymoustwo44
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0first we approximate an answer....

anonymoustwo44
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0then use the newton's method to get a better aproximation

anonymoustwo44
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0we continue this until we're satisfied

anonymoustwo44
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0but we can't still get the exact though :(

experimentX
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0currently the best way to solve is graphical method ... lol

anonymoustwo44
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0the number 5 is irritating

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i sent sam a message, he better respond .

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0what is classic about this problem anyway?

satellite73
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i assume that is \(7.3^{x1}\) and not \(7\cdot 3^{x1}\) so i have no ideas yet

satellite73
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0must be something special about 7.3 that i do not see

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0can you guys tell me later, i gotta sleep

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ok try this , let u = 3^(x+1)

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i assume there is an exact solution, otherwise youve wasted my time

.Sam.
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4I can see that you guys think so hard, lol

.Sam.
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4Sad thing for you @perl There's no exact solution but approximation \[7.3^{x1}=3^{x+1}5\]

Mimi_x3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i knew that newtoms method of approximation yesterday..

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0it would be more interesting if there was exact solution , :(

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i was confused since you said it was easy problem , rats

anonymoustwo44
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0newton's method :D

anonymoustwo44
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0newton's method :D

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ok then how is it easy to approximate?

.Sam.
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4Its easy you don't even need to think, lol

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0it didnt look easy on wolfram

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0sam , so are you going to post the solution or not. cuz im getting really tired

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0you can use a calculator for this. is that your 'easy' solution ?

.Sam.
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4you have to graph it for 7.3^(x1) and 3^(x+1)5 pick some points

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0what program do you use to graph that?

.Sam.
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4its a tedious job though, but if you have a graphing calc, it will be fine

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0then why do you say its easy?

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=7.3^%28x1%29%2B53^%28x%2B1%29%3D0

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0what do you mean , pick some points? estimate

Mimi_x3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Newtons Method i think..

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i dont think so, its just approximation problem

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0anyways, the question seemed pretty ambiguous. i didnt know what they meant by 'easy'

Mimi_x3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0lol, thats all? guessing?

.Sam.
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4you can use this program to graph https://www.desmos.com/calculator/c

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0then you do screen capture?

Mimi_x3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0sigh..you can state your question as finding the approximation than 'solve for x'

.Sam.
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4@Mimi_x3 yes its a bit of disappointing, but I'll come up with a new question later :)

.Sam.
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4@perl no i dont screen cap on that software

Mimi_x3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0lol, i wanted to see a solution..but there is no solution *sigh*

.Sam.
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4the solution is approximation ,lol

.Sam.
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.4Nevermind I'll come up a new one :)

Mimi_x3
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Alright, please state your question correctly next time.

perl
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think there is a confusion, he copied the problem originally with multiplication 7*3^(x1)

apoorvk
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0c'mon i got the approximate thing using 'jugaad' :/
Ask your own question
Ask a QuestionFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.