anonymous
  • anonymous
Ok, I'm just making sure, but if I had to find the rate of change between one number and another, I just divided them? :O so 110 divided by 50?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
2.2?
anonymous
  • anonymous
sorry my question was , was my statment true or false
anonymous
  • anonymous
What do you mean?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

amistre64
  • amistre64
a rate of change is a ratio or proportion that you can calculate between 2 ... things.
amistre64
  • amistre64
the rate of change between 5 and 7 is rather undefined unless you use a unit of time to compare too; like 2/3sec
anonymous
  • anonymous
Thats confusing, but, like I have a problem that says "find the approximate rate of change between 1970 and 1975." And on the graph, the numbers for those years are 50 and 110. So I divided them like you said? :o
amistre64
  • amistre64
in a way, yes; but becasue these dont intersect with the (0,0) we can be sure that they are moving in sync like that it is best to divide the change between them instead 1970 to 1975 is a change of 5 50 to 110 is a change of 60 therefore we can say for certain that the rate of change is 60/5
amistre64
  • amistre64
becasue they dont intersect at (0,0) we CANT be sure .... one little letter just changes the whole meaning sodent it
anonymous
  • anonymous
So...what do I do?
amistre64
  • amistre64
read the post thats 4 above this one.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Oh I didnt see that :P ok thanks
amistre64
  • amistre64
:) i was hoping it was something to that effect casue i really dont know how to explain it any simpler
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yeah its confusing :P like I have another one, its rate of change between 1995 and 2000. Im just kinda going with the effect of what you said ...idk if im right, but approximately 2000 divided by 1995 is 1.003, and 690 divided by 600 (the numbers for those years on the graph) is 1.3...so what, 1.003/1.3?? Confusedd :P
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
Basically, what you're doing is finding the slope of a graph where the x-values are years and the y-values are those other number.
slaaibak
  • slaaibak
no... 2000 - 1995 = 5 690 - 600 = 90 90 / 5 = 18
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
So if you have two points \((1995, 600)\), and \((2000, 690)\). Now you need to find the slope between those two points.
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
As slaaibak pointed out, the slope would be 18.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Well @KingGeorge we havent learned how to find the slope yet. And that makes sense @slaaibak, thanks :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
Ohkkkayy, I see now. Thanks
KingGeorge
  • KingGeorge
I suppose not knowing how to find slope would make it harder. :)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.