At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
the answer is not there, i just came from there ._.
Hi Tributized - The correct answer is a small population size. One of the defining characteristics of the Hardy-Weinberg principle is a limited population size.
@Atam , why u say it is small population size
in a hardy weinberd principle, the population need to be big!!! plz show u why u think the population is small
The correct answer is random mating, that means each allele has a equal chance to mate with another allele The rest of the options give u variations in alleles frequencies!!!
I can give you a more detail explanation if u need to that's why you always need to ask "why" for the answer given If it is wrong, it might actually screw u over
._. good thing i didn't turn it in yet. i thought it was right because i just read something about population.
You're right CMKC 109! I mis-read the question! A small population size would be a huge problem because the population has to be large enough to minimize random sampling errors. Please have my medal back :(
It's alright xD
no problem , it's good to try to answer questions :) and good that u know the right answer now :)
do u mind answering two more questions?
sure if i know the answer :)
but better if u open a new post
Gee, I'm not sure I should answer any more! Maybe I need a nap!
Why do new species evolve more rapidly after a mass extinction? Few organisms survive, which allows the remaining organisms to reproduce rapidly. Mutations increase during mass extinctions, which then increase the rate of evolution. Ecological niches become available for organisms to evolve into by adaptive radiation. There is a lot more food available, so the remaining organisms are able to flourish.
other one is Species of anteaters in Australia, Africa, and South America are not closely related. However, they share similar characteristics that they use to eat ants and termites, including a long sticky tongue, large salivary glands, and a rugged stomach. This is an example of punctuated equilibrium because one species evolved into several related species over a short period of time. convergent evolution because different species developed similar adaptations to similar environments. adaptive radiation because one species evolved into several different forms that occupy different niches. coevolution because the evolving anteaters evolved together to interact with the changing environment.
Few organisms survive, which allows the remaining organisms to reproduce rapidly.
hmm u sure it's not ecological niches?
well, extinction involves competition between 2 species (can be more than 2) so extinction is usually when 1 species is driven out, then the rest with a better traits will reproduce quickly
but i'm not strongest in evolution, still learning it , so it will be better if u can post up as a new question so more people can help u
well ok thanks for answering :)
and the 2nd one, i believe is convergent evolution same trait but not related
they live in similar environment which causes them to evolve in similar traits, even if they are not related
yup you're right