Ace school

with brainly

  • Get help from millions of students
  • Learn from experts with step-by-step explanations
  • Level-up by helping others

A community for students.

The product of n whole numbers 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x ... x (n-1) x n, has twenty-eight consecutive zeros. Find the largest value of n.

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

To see the expert answer you'll need to create a free account at Brainly

what are zeros??
"0". This is a zero. Consecutive zeros are zeros that appear consecutively, i.e. The product of 10 x 10x 10 has 3 consecutive zeros (1ooo)
It's somewhat tedious to explain the whole thing. One interesting observation is there would be only trailing zeroes.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

@ffm i'll try before you
Just tell me how you work it out, or the solution/methodology. The answer is not so important.
i think between 1 and 10, you will have 2 zeros.
I have used binary search along with the usual De Polignac's formula (just) twice to yield 124 as the answer. Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Polignac%27s_formula
"Consecutive zeros are zeros that appear consecutively, i.e. The product of 10 x 10x 10 has 3 consecutive zeros (1ooo)" You haven't understood the problem.
sorry, 139
@ffm is it correct??
33 for 139.
I have posted the correct answer.
ah ... where did i screwed up??
@FoolforMath, how did you manage to get 124?
looks like my theory screwed up from here http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=30%21%2F20%21&dataset=&equal=Submit
3 zeros ,,,?? how 25*22 = 00 => two zeros were coming from here. so all the factors of 100 or 1000 or 10000 ... were causing problem for my idea.
1-10 : 2 zeros 10-20: 2 20-30: 3 (25 is factor of 100) 30-40: 2 40-50: 3 (50 is factor of 100) 60-60: 2 60-70: 2 70-80: 3 (at some point 75 will give two zeros) 80-90: 2 90-100: 3 (100 itself gives two) ----------------------- so from 0 to 100 we have: 24 zeros 100-110: 2 110-120: 2 ----------------------- I guess that would give 28 zeros screw you ---> minions of 100
the answer was n = 120
The largest power of 5 dividing n must be 5^28.Now use De Polignac's Formula.
120! = 6689502913449127057588118054090372586752746333138029810295671352301633557244962989366874165271984981308157637893214090552534408589408121859898481114389650005964960521256960000000000000000000000000000 Of course you need an analytic proof of that using 2 and 5.
Should the question be, find the smallest n to achieve that?

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question