Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

angela210793

Find all the solutions possible of the system ...using matrices

  • 2 years ago
  • 2 years ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. wasiqss
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    system is hidden LOl

    • 2 years ago
  2. Kreshnik
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    wait a second.. she must be writing it !!

    • 2 years ago
  3. angela210793
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1334243246880:dw|

    • 2 years ago
  4. wasiqss
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    anxhela , you want it to be done by cramer's rule or gauss elimination

    • 2 years ago
  5. angela210793
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i did |dw:1334243367057:dw| i know wassiq...but u can't use cramer when determinative equals 0

    • 2 years ago
  6. angela210793
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1334243466671:dw|

    • 2 years ago
  7. wasiqss
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ahhh yes, determinant is zero . we must go for gauss elimination

    • 2 years ago
  8. wasiqss
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    do you know gauss, i can do that

    • 2 years ago
  9. angela210793
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i did |dw:1334243615536:dw| krocker-capelli but i got

    • 2 years ago
  10. angela210793
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i know Gauss but we have a k in there

    • 2 years ago
  11. wasiqss
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    good :), i havnt done krocker one til yet, but yes k would have been a headache in gauss

    • 2 years ago
  12. Zarkon
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 5

    k has to be 1

    • 2 years ago
  13. Zarkon
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 5

    if you want a solution

    • 2 years ago
  14. angela210793
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    how did u find it

    • 2 years ago
  15. TuringTest
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Zarkon is the only one I won't chastise for just giving answer since they are so provocative ;)

    • 2 years ago
  16. Zarkon
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 5

    -2 times row one = row 3

    • 2 years ago
  17. wasiqss
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Zarkon if k=1 , then game is over :D

    • 2 years ago
  18. Zarkon
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 5

    no...if \(k\ne 1\) then there is no soluition.

    • 2 years ago
  19. Zarkon
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 5

    solution

    • 2 years ago
  20. angela210793
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    u see..i tried Gauss..and i got at the row3 0 0 0 2 where did i got wrong O.o

    • 2 years ago
  21. Zarkon
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 5

    \[\left.\begin{matrix}x-y+z=k \\ -2x+2y-2z=-2\end{matrix}\right.\] multiply first by 2 \[\Rightarrow\] \[\left.\begin{matrix}2x-2y+2z=2k \\ -2x+2y-2z=-2\end{matrix}\right.\] add you get \(0=2k-2\Rightarrow k=1\)

    • 2 years ago
  22. wasiqss
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    NIce work zarkon

    • 2 years ago
  23. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    If you put the augmented matrix in reduced row echelon form you get \[\left[\begin{matrix}1 &0 & 1&1 +k/2 \\ 0 & 1 &0 & 1-k/2 \\ 0 & 0 & 0&2k-2 \\\end{matrix}\right]\]

    • 2 years ago
  24. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    as zarkon noted, k must be 1 for there to be a solution. However, note that there are an infinite # of sols if k=1, because you have a non-zero null space

    • 2 years ago
  25. angela210793
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    the system would have infinite solutions for r(A)=r(Ab) and no solutions for r(A)<r(Ab) how do u find the range of Ab when u have k in there..r(A)=r(Ab) if k wasn't 1....sorry mozilla froze -_-

    • 2 years ago
  26. angela210793
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok...thanks

    • 2 years ago
  27. phi
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    The complete solution is \[\left(\begin{matrix}3/2 \\ 1/2 \\ 0\end{matrix}\right)+c\left(\begin{matrix}1 \\ 0 \\ -1\end{matrix}\right)\] where c is arbitrary

    • 2 years ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.