A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
angela210793
 3 years ago
Find all the solutions possible of the system ...using matrices
angela210793
 3 years ago
Find all the solutions possible of the system ...using matrices

This Question is Closed

Kreshnik
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0wait a second.. she must be writing it !!

angela210793
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1334243246880:dw

wasiqss
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0anxhela , you want it to be done by cramer's rule or gauss elimination

angela210793
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i did dw:1334243367057:dw i know wassiq...but u can't use cramer when determinative equals 0

angela210793
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1334243466671:dw

wasiqss
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ahhh yes, determinant is zero . we must go for gauss elimination

wasiqss
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0do you know gauss, i can do that

angela210793
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i did dw:1334243615536:dw krockercapelli but i got

angela210793
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i know Gauss but we have a k in there

wasiqss
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0good :), i havnt done krocker one til yet, but yes k would have been a headache in gauss

TuringTest
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Zarkon is the only one I won't chastise for just giving answer since they are so provocative ;)

Zarkon
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.52 times row one = row 3

wasiqss
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Zarkon if k=1 , then game is over :D

Zarkon
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5no...if \(k\ne 1\) then there is no soluition.

angela210793
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0u see..i tried Gauss..and i got at the row3 0 0 0 2 where did i got wrong O.o

Zarkon
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5\[\left.\begin{matrix}xy+z=k \\ 2x+2y2z=2\end{matrix}\right.\] multiply first by 2 \[\Rightarrow\] \[\left.\begin{matrix}2x2y+2z=2k \\ 2x+2y2z=2\end{matrix}\right.\] add you get \(0=2k2\Rightarrow k=1\)

phi
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0If you put the augmented matrix in reduced row echelon form you get \[\left[\begin{matrix}1 &0 & 1&1 +k/2 \\ 0 & 1 &0 & 1k/2 \\ 0 & 0 & 0&2k2 \\\end{matrix}\right]\]

phi
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0as zarkon noted, k must be 1 for there to be a solution. However, note that there are an infinite # of sols if k=1, because you have a nonzero null space

angela210793
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0the system would have infinite solutions for r(A)=r(Ab) and no solutions for r(A)<r(Ab) how do u find the range of Ab when u have k in there..r(A)=r(Ab) if k wasn't 1....sorry mozilla froze _

phi
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0The complete solution is \[\left(\begin{matrix}3/2 \\ 1/2 \\ 0\end{matrix}\right)+c\left(\begin{matrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 1\end{matrix}\right)\] where c is arbitrary
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.