Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

secondary succession always occur after primary true or false?

See more answers at
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly


Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

I would assume yes. Primary means it happens first or is more important. Secondary has the same root as Second. I'm not sure how you could have a secondary succession without a first one.
Actually, though that was a very logical reply, @PsychoTink, I believe the answer is false. Primary and Secondary (in this case) refer to two different /types/ of succession, rather than a sequence of events. Primary succession occurs when an area devoid of life and soil is being first colonized. Think primary as in first - the first organisms are coming to colonize a new area. Secondary succession occurs when a fire or comparable event strikes an ecosystem, and temporarily destroys an area of land. The process of repopulating the area begins - think secondary as in the area was previously inhabited.
I tried. Thought I'd try to give something more helpful than "fool"

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

^Very appreciated! Woksmen's reply certainly was not..very constructive.
duh.. fool ??? anyways ans is false now can any one xplain me y ??
Heena, kma230 already gave an explanation of why.
my fault i didnt saw the ans :P dunno what happens me dat time :P
Say What!!!???
srry got my ans as u can read the anss given by kma

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question