


This Question is Closed

AravindG
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
dw:1334683102023:dw

AravindG
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
@colorful , @experimentX

AravindG
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
@FoolForMath , @Ishaan94 , @DHASHNI

dpaInc
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
did you try partial fractios?

dpaInc
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
**fractions

FoolForMath
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
Yes partial fraction is the way.

AravindG
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
hw to make the work less tedous seems a lot of wrk is needed

experimentX
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
1
Oo .. I found and error.

AravindG
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
?


colorful
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
how to make the work less tedious:
use linear lagebra

colorful
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
linear algebra lol

AravindG
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
:P

colorful
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
if you can use Cramer's rule for large systems that is one way, but I don't suppose you've studied that yet

colorful
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
in cases like this it is annoying because you can't just put certain values of x to find the coefficients