Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

wcaprar

Calc II Alternating Remainder Estimate Help Needed

  • 2 years ago
  • 2 years ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. wcaprar
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Determine the smallest number of terms required to approximate the sum of the series with an error less than 0.0001. \[\sum_{n}^{\infty}(-7^k)/(6^kk!)\]

    • 2 years ago
  2. wcaprar
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I understand that you would set the sum equal to .0001 and solve for k. Right?

    • 2 years ago
  3. wcaprar
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I can simplify the equation by saying (1/k!)x(7/6)^k right?

    • 2 years ago
  4. bmp
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    If I understood the problem correctly, there are a couple of ways to do it. Remember that the remainder estimate for alternating series is given by:\[|R_n| \le b_{n+1}\]So yeah, you can simplify it and put in the form:\[0,0001 \le \frac{7^{k+1}}{6^{k+1}(k+1)!} = \frac{1}{(k+1)!}*(\frac{7}{6})^{k+1}\]Or if you have a calculator, you can start expanding some terms until one of them is < 0.0001

    • 2 years ago
  5. wcaprar
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I did that and I got to the seventh term, it was the right answer! Thanks! But on the test I won't be able to use a calculator, can this problem be solved some way w/o one?

    • 2 years ago
  6. bmp
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    If they ask for the smallest number, I guess you have to 1) manually compute the values or 2) solve an equation of the form above. If they do not, just pick a reasonable number and compute it, like n = 10. Very likely the error will be really small and it would suffice the boundary for |Rn|

    • 2 years ago
  7. bmp
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    And by the way, doing a series test without a calculator sucks a lot, huh

    • 2 years ago
  8. eliassaab
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I agree with @bmp and add that you must fire your teacher.

    • 2 years ago
  9. wcaprar
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Im not sure if we will be given this same type of problem but we did go over a problem like this in class that was WAY easier that we solved with very little effort

    • 2 years ago
  10. eliassaab
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Why should one compute 7^k for k=1 to 7 and similar problems by hand. Those antiquated teachers should be trained to undersatand that the world has changed and they should follow the flow.

    • 2 years ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.