A parliamentary democracy doesn't have a judicial branch. Why doesn't a parliamentary democracy have one?
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
The Judiciary in Great Britain is entirely non-political. Judges are drawn from the upper echelons of the legal profession.
Law in Great Britain can be made two ways; either by legislation or by judicial ruling. I hope that helps you.
Well, could we just talk general. Instead of Great Britain
Well as I see it is there in none and so another system must be used to fill that gap. From example I have seen systems like GB are the most common
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
A parliamentary system doesn't have divided government. Sovereignty rests entirely with Parlaiment. There isn't an Executive Branch, either: executive power is simply vested in one legislator from the ruling party in the Parlaiment, the Prime Minister. The relationship of the judiciary to Parlaiment can be complicated, since judges historically answer to the king, and depends on exactly how and to what extent the king's sovereignty was transferred to Parlaiment.