At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
Im stuck between the first and last one
they are all true
Well which one of these proves that the diagonals of the rectangle bisect each other.
now any ideas?
either the first or last, but you knew that already
because if you drop a perpendicular to touch the base it forms a rght angled triangle with the same distance...half distance really of the width of the formed rectangle.
i can not see any difference between the first and last
can you draw the perpendicular @emanumak|dw:1335874943323:dw|
so what is your finl verdict
For proving that the diagonals of a rectangle bisects each other we have to prove that BE=ED and AE=EC. |dw:1335875476114:dw|
From your figure, BE=AE=EC=ED is for a square.
so you have to write Both be= ae & be=ce in the blank?
No it can only be one
perhaps the context is important here, can you provide the closed passage
Discerning from this, it seems to me that there is something wrong or incomplete with this question.
There is actually a proof but I couldn't load it up but here is the sentence aboce the proof
The two-column proof with missing statement proves that the diagonals of the rectangle bisect each other
so is it the first or last?
it depends on the sentence before the blank
Definition of a Parallelogram thats what it says
Im thinking its be=ae?
ok can you write the sentence that includes the blank as well