- Schrodinger

Could someone try and explain a Manifold to me? I've looked on Wolfram and elsewhere but I can't really find a uniform, concise definition of what it exactly is.

- chestercat

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- anonymous

In simple terms, a manifold is just a generalization (and therefore includes) the simpler geometric spaces you already know, odd shaped spaces if you like, which if you just look at a small piece, are still Euclidean.

- Schrodinger

What makes Geometry Euclidean. I mean, could you provide me a specific example of a manifold object, or a non-manifold one and give the explicit reasons why they are so? I'm looking fr a comprehensive definition.

- Schrodinger

Thanks regardless, but i'm really trying to understand this.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- Schrodinger

*the Geometry of the objects Euclidean

- anonymous

"What makes Geometry Euclidean"
Euclidean space is the space we are in and the rules that apply there (usually modelled as R^3).
Other sorts of spaces include hyperbolic space or spacetime.
Say you take a sphere (I already said it is a generalization and includes the familiar).
OK, you know it is a sphere but if you were standing on it (like on the Earth) it would not be immediately obvious that it was anything other than flat (ie Euclidean).
Also have a look here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thurston_conjecture

- Schrodinger

I understand that but i've heard of several other qualifying "features" that make a figure Manifold. All I understand is that single point, and i've hear other very, very different things, which is why i'm trying to find everything I can to really, really nab it.

- Schrodinger

(I'm also not sure who's right. I've seen/heard so many different things on this. Also, thanks so much for this stuff so far.)

- anonymous

If you're trying to think about it non-rigorously, the easiest way to think about a manifold is to think about Earth. Earth is a 3-dimensional object, but we live on a 2-dimensional plane on the "outside" of that object. That's the easiest example of a manifold.

- anonymous

If you want more rigorous than that it kinda does require a decent grounding in topology.

- Schrodinger

If so, then where would I learn more about topology in this sense? When I hear about topology the few times it's been commonly spoken, lol, it's generally referring to less rudimental, fundamental geometrical concepts and more so to maps and geography.

- anonymous

You might be thinking of topography. Topology is a pretty important area of mathematics, if you're looking for an introductory course I think usually recommended is the text Topology by JR Munkres

- anonymous

Topology is generally pretty advanced stuff, though, so keep that in mind going in.

- anonymous

Did you look at the link I gave you? (and the linked Uniformization theorem).
Understanding this stuff requires some background in topology and classical geometries plus Riemannian geometry (actually the more geometry/topology the merrier).
Instead of asking what is a manifold (which I think I have explained) you need to ask what do I want to do with it? Do you want to do calculus on it, for example. Then you need your manifold to be differentiable.In what dimension do you want to work? 2,3, infinite?

- Schrodinger

This one? http://www.amazon.com/Topology-First-Course-James-Munkres/dp/0139254951 I looked at the link, but I understood little at first glance. I'm willing to try to read that but it won't make much sense to me at the moment, lol. Yeah, I have no background in any of that, i'm just a curious high school student.

- Schrodinger

I've done precalc and a very minimal amount of calculus, so, yeah...lol.

- anonymous

Pretty sure that's the right book, yeah. To be honest though, I would wait until you've done a lot more math.

- anonymous

Topology usually isn't even introduced until relatively late in the course of undergraduate studies, and it will be very helpful to have taken some analysis first.

- Schrodinger

Okay. At what point would you think I would start to comprehend this stuff or at least study it? I'm not going for a math major, but I am doing Physics for my undergrad and might pursue math later at a separate time. Oh, okay.

- anonymous

If you are that way inclined you could try to get to grips with Special Relativity as a way in...

- anonymous

Back later

- Schrodinger

I understand Special Relativity to a decent degree, but I don't see how it could be a way in other than the analogy between the relativity of frames of reference to an object being two dimensional or Manifold, unless that's what it was. Thanks so much man. I would medal both you guys if I could, lol.

- anonymous

I don't remember exactly the ordering of courses in most undergrad math programs, but topology is definitely after a good amount of calculus, differential equations, linear algebra, and i'm pretty sure it comes after real analysis and modern algebra also. It requires a pretty decent mathematical grounding.
As for special relativity, I think both special and general relativity rely on topology to a decent degree, but I have not studied them in-depth so that's just a guess.

- Schrodinger

Yeah. I've only studied the conceptual components of Relativity overall to a basic degree and worked with the already derived equations of stuff so I didn't have to go through the calculus or complex math of any of it. Well, in general, thanks. Looks like i've got a long way to go...

- anonymous

Haha we all have a long way to go, use it as an inspiration :)

- anonymous

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space

- Schrodinger

Oh, i've seen this before. I've never seen it referred to as that before, though.

- anonymous

Well worth finding a history of the events around that time and the people involved.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.