Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

What is the difference between exp(z) and \(e^z\). z is complex.

See more answers at
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly


Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

I didn't know there was any
notation i think unless i am sadly mistaken they are the same
no difference - they are synonyms

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

since exponents can get pretty messy; the exp(...) notation is for clarity
the of exp(..) as a similar notation to log(...)
I have a book which defines exp(z) as \(e^x(cos y +isiny) \) where z=x+iy and it defines \(e^z~as~exp(z~Log~e)\) where Log is used to denote the multivalued Logarithmic function
is Log e = 1?
\(Logz=e^{logr}+i\theta +2ni\pi\) where \(z=r(cos\theta+isin\theta)\) this might be useful
So Log e is a multivalued function. It has an infinite number of values and 1 is one of the values it takes.
Can you all guide me somewhere, like a book or may be an user of OS, who can help on this
actually as i recall the notation Log is single values whereas log is multivalued, but i could be wrong
Yes, right, that is why I mentioned it
So as to avoid any confusion. @satellite73 you are right, but some books write it the other way round.
\[\log(z)=\ln(|z|)+i\theta\] for any \(\theta\) whereas \[Log(z)=\ln(|x|)+i\theta\] for \[-\pi\leq\theta\leq\pi\]
@Zarkon can you help please?
@amistre64 You have provided a great link. So I choose your answer as the best answer.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question