At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
Okay, my parametric equation is x=3+3t^2, y+3t^2+t^3. to find dy/dx you divide (dy/dt)/(dx/dt). Which I can do no problem.
For the first derivative I got for 1-((3t^2)/(4t)). Which the online homework problem says is correct.
To find the second derivative I have to find d/dt (dy/dx). I separated the two parts and got 0 for the one, of course, and then used the quotient rule on the -3t^2/4t part. Is this correct?
a paramentric eqution is also a vector equation: r(t) =
x=3+3t^2 , y=3t^2+t^3 x'=6t , y=6t+3t r'(t) = < 6t , 6t+3t^2 > which is what youve got for the tangent
Lol, I mixed two problems in what I explained, but yes, go on
r''(t) is just the next derivative. r''(t) = <6, 6+6t> if im reading it right
http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/ParaTangent.aspx might help
bout 3/4 of the way down it goes into 2nd derivative
a tiff? really?
you got that in a jpeg?
I just sliced a portion of the window to get the picture
soo dy/dx = 1+ t/2 stick this in the derivative thing for: 1/2 right?
Yeah, you're right. But what I have is a dy/dx = 1-3t^2/4t
or the right dy/dx .. lol
Sorry, I starting typing the first, which is pretty easy when I was actually going for a second problem. But this is the spot I always get confused. With that dy/dx I would lose the one and use quotient rule to solve for -3t^2/4t, wouldn't I? But when I do that it says I got the problem wrong
reduce it by t and you got -3t/4 which is simpler to derive
not reduce ..... simplify
Oh my Gosh!! I can't believe I wasn't seeing that! Thank you!