At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
Close open is not better than ask spamming.
that seems a lot...
I like @inkyvoyd 's idea. However, I think around 5 per hour would be safer against spammers. Igba does have a point regarding the open/close. It's no better than the previous design.
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
We're playing with this idea, but we haven't seen an overwhelming amount of close/reask abuse to justify implementing this for that reason alone. Of course, @cshalvey may correct me if I'm wrong on that.
Not spammers. test cheaters. I'm sick of doing people's tests for them (inkyvoyd the scumbag here actually asked a test question about biology lol)
You realize that by saying that, you're being a hypocrite right? lol
No, I'm not a hypocrite at all. I'm sick of hypocrites (see what I just did there?).
Not really but I'll take your word for it. ☺
So, test cheating is something that no time limit we enforce is going to solve. It's a behavioral issue. In short, all I see this feature doing is punishing people for getting help to their problems quickly. :\