At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
the numbers are 29, 20, 21
is it a right angled triangle ??/
all you have to do is use similarity. see what angles are the same.
and then use proportions. As you can see, the sides 29 and b are proportional, because the hypotenuse of the two similar triangles. same goes ofr the other sides. like this: actually it's 29/b=20/21=21/a for b: 29/b=20/21 b=(20/21)29 for a: 21/a=20/21 a=(20/21)21 get it?
Yes Thanks Alot :)
you have the right idea nickymarden, but you have the wrong values It should be a/20 = 20/21 which after solving for 'a' gives you a = 400/21 and b/20 = 29/21 which gives you b = 580/21
haha, yeah you're right. sorry. it's 2 am here, can't blame me..
But I love this way better. I was set to use the pythagorean theorem until you wrote that lol
I don't think there is any way to. Is there, Jim?
SO , A = 400/21 And B = 580/21
yes love, i'm sorry. @jim_thompson5910 is right :)
its okay thanks
what do you mean SmoothMath?
I don't think that good ol' Pythag can solve this problem.
Since we have two right triangles, we can say b^2 + 29^2 = (21+a)^2 and a^2+20^2 = b^2 So we have a system of two equations with 2 unknowns. This means we can solve for a and b.
Except that you're assuming this is a right angle, and that is not given: |dw:1337232422096:dw|
Ah, but it can be proven.
it's not explicit, but the fact that the two triangles are similar allows us to use either method
But a roundabout way to solve it indeed. Haha, funny that it's the first way you thought of.
lol just been using it a lot more than the other method I guess