Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

int. dx/ (x^2 +2x+10) using partial fraction. please.

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

To see the expert answer you'll need to create a free account at Brainly

you can't factor that
best approach is to complete the square and then trig substitution
yehh, it will have complex factors

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

yup
@lilMissMindset To complete the square x^2 +2x+10= x^2+2x+1+9 = (x+1)^2 +3^2 \[\int\limits_{}^{}\frac{dx}{(x+1)^2+3^2}\] Now complete the rest
Remember \[\int\limits_{}^{}\frac{dt}{x^2+a^2} = \frac{1}{a} \tan^{-1}(\frac{x}{a})\]
You can eaily prove the above by substituting x = atan(theta)
@shivam_bhalla she said partial fraction
but it cannot be done with partial fraction if it cannot be factored
traile , it willl become very complex then
yeah, im supposed to use that, partial fraction
@LOL, whjy do you want to complicate things when there is a aeasier method available. If you still insist on partial fraction, then it is fine
lil miss it will only have complex factors
there is either a typo, or it's impossible
*why
I mean that using partial fractions is impossible... or at least redundant
what am i going to do about this problem then?
Take x+1 = t dx=dt You still get the same thing with partial fractions too
how would you do this with partial fractions? I don't see it... perhaps I am wrong though, it wouldn't be the first time :P
do you think quadratic factors can be use
\[\frac{1}{t^2+9} = \frac{At+B}{t^2+9}\] we see a = 0, B=1 We again get back the same thing. So partail fraction approach should be useless
*partial
like I said then, it's just redundant
by impossible, I meant that the operation is useless, as you just said
you fail turing xD lol jk
@lilMissMindset are you \(sure\) there isn't a typo in your post?
yea. im quite sure i typed it right.
let's ignore the partial fraction thingy then.
then shivam bhalla has shown you the right way do you know trig substitution integrals?
yeah. i'm sorry, i'll do it using trig substitution. thank you so much.
welcome!

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question