anonymous
  • anonymous
how to find the time required to fall an electron to proton when electron is attracted to proton?
Physics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
roadjester
  • roadjester
Dang, you're gonna need to specify that it's electromagnetism. I've only gotten to the "Mechanics" section of physics. :(
JamesJ
  • JamesJ
What is the Coloumb force between the two particles? It is \[ F = \frac{ke^2}{r^2} \] where e is the charge on electron/proton, r is the distance between them and k is the Coloumb constant. Now if you want to solve the problem of how it would take for an electron and proton initially at rest to collide, you'll need to solve the (mechanics!) problem of for what time t is r(t) = 0. This is not an easy problem. You can find another working of that sort of problem here: http://openstudy.com/study?login#/updates/4f42fe64e4b065f388dc742a
angelina
  • angelina
see you have the force experienced by the electron due to proton which is F=k e^2/r^2 if you have the dist b/w them and they are at rest. now dividing it by mass of the electron you would get the accln and then u can calculate the time by the formula s=ut + 1/2at^2. but if they were not initially at rest then i dont know and if u come to know plz let me also know it

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

JamesJ
  • JamesJ
(*correction: link I gave above is not correct; it is this one below) You can't naively apply s = ut + at^2/2 because here the acceleration is not constant precisely because F as a function of distance r is not a constant. See this link for how to solve the resulting differential equation: http://openstudy.com/study#/updates/4f0de661e4b084a815fcff56

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.