A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
ajprincess
 4 years ago
prove\[(\neg p\wedge(\neg q\wedge r))\vee(q\wedge r)\vee(p\wedge q)=r\]
ajprincess
 4 years ago
prove\[(\neg p\wedge(\neg q\wedge r))\vee(q\wedge r)\vee(p\wedge q)=r\]

This Question is Closed

ajprincess
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1338094648240:dw prove this using laws of algebra of propositions.

ajprincess
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@amistre64, @jamesJ, @turingtest

ajprincess
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1338095286775:dw Except this other all are right.

ajprincess
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ya sure. thanx. :) can u help me to prove it if u dnt mind.

TuringTest
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0not used to this kind of thing,; I'm not sure what the technically right approach would be start making assumptions I guess...

ajprincess
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ha k. thanx. @jamesJ if u dnt can u plzzz help me with this question?

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3How have you proved these sorts of things in the past? The most straightforward way to show this would be write out a truth table with eight rows, one row for each of the truth value combinations of p, q and r

ajprincess
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i am ok with proving it using truth table. this is one of my past paper question. they hav askd to prove t using laws of algebra of propositions. bt I am nt ued to it.

ajprincess
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@asnaseer can u plzz help me vth this if u dnt mind.

ajprincess
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@JamesJ u too. can u help me plzzz

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3So you want to prove this now using propositions?

ajprincess
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I tried bt was unable to get t.

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3I just constructed the truth table and the question as written here looks wrong. Could you please triple check it.

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3I think it might be this, but you check it! \[ (\neg p\wedge(\neg q\wedge r))\vee(q\wedge r)\vee(p\wedge r)=r \]

ajprincess
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ya that's it. sooo sorrry for the mistake.

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3ok, well you factor out ^ r from each of these terms and you have ( ~p^~q) v q v p ) ^ r

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3and ( ~p^~q) v q v p is always true. Hence the entire expression is equivalent to TRUE ^ r = r

ajprincess
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0bt hw do v knw that ( ~p^~q) v q v p is always true?

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3because ~p^~q = ~(p v q) and hence (~p^~q) v q v p = ~(p v q) v (p v q)

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3...and X v ~X is always true.

ajprincess
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I get t nw. thanxxxxxxxx a lot.
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.