Ace school

with brainly

  • Get help from millions of students
  • Learn from experts with step-by-step explanations
  • Level-up by helping others

A community for students.

[SOLVED] Here's a cute predicate logic problem. Prove or disprove: \[\forall x \,\exists y \,\forall z\, \exists w \;\;\text{such that} \;\;x+y+z+w=xyzw\]Assume that \(x, y, z, w \in \mathbb{C}\).

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

To see the expert answer you'll need to create a free account at Brainly

is xyzw a combination of digit or multiplication of digit??
multiplication
lol .. didn't realize they were complex

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

It doesn't really matter. I just put that specification on there so that know one tried to change the problem so that addition and multiplication had different meanings.
Just prove/disprove it for \(\mathbb{R}\) and it will become clear why it doesn't matter if they're complex numbers.
Hint below in white LaTeX\[\color{white}{\text{There is a certain value for y that you should choose to prove it.}}\]
\[ \color{white}{\text{LOL i didn't know that!!.}} \]
Another, probably more helpful hint, below in white LaTeX\[\color{white}{\text{What value of y can you choose so that xyzw is constant?}}\]
Choose y=0, then choose w=-(x+z).
Bingo.
But ∃y doesn't mean that y is rather a variable such that we have to fit constraint ??
\(\exists\, y\) means that we can choose a specific value for y. It's a variable, but one that we have complete control over.
then it must be false ... i guess so!!
The "there exists" only means that at least one possible value of y where this is true. One value that we know works is \(y=0\). This means that there does exists at least one value for \(y\) that makes the statement true, so we have proven that the original statement is true.
does't y=0 make statement untrue?? xyzw=0, for y=0
Right, both the sum and the multiplication end up equaling zero because you set w=-(x+z).
If \(y\) is 0, and \(x=-(x+z)\) we have \[x+0+z+(-(x+z))=x+z-x-z=0\]and \[x\cdot0\cdot z\cdot w=0\]So that means that \[x+y+z+w=xyzw\]
Oh ... stupid me ... i never considered the negative values!!
Hope everyone enjoyed this little (unintuitive) problem. Good night.
thanks!! i'll try to think broader way next time!!
I'll try to get a problem just for you next time then. Any preference about the subject?

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question