.

- anonymous

.

- chestercat

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- anonymous

1) a reflection over the y-axis, followed by a reflection over the x-axis

- anonymous

That sounds correct to me

- anonymous

oh, ok
I just need 2) & 3) I think...

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- anonymous

Yes, that is correct

- anonymous

On 2) which CC there's three.

- anonymous

Hmmmmmmmmmmm

- anonymous

ok, first..

- anonymous

you

- goformit100

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

- anonymous

i rally need help cause i don't get it.. i got confused!!! :(
so i would really appreciate the help from anyone right now!!!

- goformit100

ok

- anonymous

|dw:1338667087210:dw|
imagine if C was on that firs line... what would the distance be then between C and C'' ?

- anonymous

is it:
Distance between k and m = 2.6 inches
Distance from C to the distance from C" to m = 2.6 inches because this is a translation.
2.6 inches + 2.6 inches = 5.2 inches
5.2 inches
or not???

- anonymous

two reflections over separate parallel lines = translation

- anonymous

wht does thts mean dpalnc???

- anonymous

so what is it then???
i have no clue then!!!

- anonymous

|dw:1338667406829:dw|
oh, yeah... your right... 5.2

- anonymous

i'm bad with these transformations.... :(

- anonymous

so it is 5.2???

- anonymous

wait... lemme double check..

- anonymous

can you help me with number "3)"???
i would really appreciate it!!

- anonymous

yes it is... :)

- AccessDenied

|dw:1338667559696:dw|
If maybe that representation makes sense, to see why its 5.2:
we have the 2.6 in the center, and then the two segments that compose 2.6 on the outside to make another 2.6.

- anonymous

@AccessDenied
so it is 5.2??? right!!!

- anonymous

|dw:1338667679753:dw|

- anonymous

@dpaInc & @AccessDenied
so its settled... the answer is 5.2???!!!
right???

- AccessDenied

Yes. lol
as for the next one, I'd have to think about that one.

- anonymous

ok, but please do help me :)
i would realllyyy appreciate ur help and dpalnc's help tooo!!! alot!!!

- anonymous

|dw:1338668173430:dw|

- anonymous

isn't it obvious now? go get from A to A''?

- anonymous

**to get

- anonymous

is it right wht i got???

- anonymous

"length of CC'' = 110 degrees" ??
when did they start using degrees to measure length?

- anonymous

i gotta read up more.. :)

- anonymous

if uur doing 3), it says Find the angle of rotation that maps A onto A".
so i guess it says to find it in degreess?? right???

- anonymous

yep...
you seem stressed... take a break... have a donut...:)

- anonymous

hahaha, yeah sort of because i gave beeen working on these problems for a long period of time. and the hw is due tomorrow!!! so yeah..
so wht is the answer for |dw:1338668638807:dw|

- anonymous

this shows that to get from A to A'' , just double the angle between the two intersecting lines of reflection... :)
we didn't give you directly that the angle of rotation is twice that... i thought this clearly shows how much you should rotate to get to where you want to...|dw:1338668814266:dw|

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.