Easy yet cute problem, if \( p^{12}=q^6=r^3=s^2, p \neq 1 \). Find the value of \(\log_p pqrs \). Lets see who can solve this the fastest. Pleas read on for the extra question (posted later): How many values of \(x \) satisfy the equation \( \log (2x)=\frac 14 \log (x-15)^4 \)?

- anonymous

- Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com

Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

- chestercat

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

- anonymous

is it 13

- apoorvk

23/12

- apoorvk

13

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- anonymous

q=p^2 r=p^4 s=p^6 2+4+6+1=13

- apoorvk

I think too much actually :/ and act too hastily. :/ It is 13.

- anonymous

I like posting sitters for a change ... :P

- asnaseer

I think it can have several values:\[1+4\pm2\pm6\]

- asnaseer

since q and s can be negative

- anonymous

Asnaseer, we do not know if the even number radical function is defined for strictly positive or negative. Positive is assumed.

- asnaseer

so are you saying, for example, that:\[s=-p^6\]is not a valid solution to this?

- anonymous

Hmm... Rather hard to say exactly what I mean. It's true that \(s=-p^6\). But, I assumed we were using the positive roots only because that's conventional. Otherwise, as you see, our function is actually a multivalued relation rather than a function and thus the logarithm becomes murkily defined. (I am potentially abusing terminology here.)

- asnaseer

maybe FFM can clarify?

- anonymous

My main point is that if we allow ourselves to take both of the roots, the logarithm is no longer a function. This can't be the case, since the logarithm is always a function.

- asnaseer

BTW: You are most probably correct Limitless. I am not a /true/ mathematician as such - I only follow maths as a hobby.

- anonymous

I hope you realize that I am still impressed by your solution, critique aside.

- asnaseer

:) thx

- anonymous

Asnaseer is technically right, but I am happy with the less pedantic solution for this one.

- asnaseer

Is there some article on this area that I could read about to help me understand this better?

- anonymous

asnaseer, precisely what confuses you? This is more of a notion of convention rather than of serious mathematical concepts.

- asnaseer

your description of log being a function and therefore it can only have one value - I was just wondering if there was any formal definition of this concept somewhere?

- apoorvk

Well. I seem to think that 'q' and 's' can be negative, but their resultant powers would definitely be positive - so how does the question of the powers being 'negative' arise? s= (-p)^6 ---> alrighty! but the exponent can only be '6' right? of the exponent changes sign, then the whole thingy changes. Or am I totally wrong once again? -_-

- anonymous

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_(mathematics)#Formal_definition :) I rather love formal definitions if they are also intuitively beautiful. This is one such case. The reason that functions are considered injective and surjective (i.e. one-to-one, which is what I have been saying) is that this allows us to suppose the existence of their inversion via another function! It's rather interesting stuff. :)

- asnaseer

good point apoorvk!

- asnaseer

does that mean that:\[\log_p(-p)^6\]is undefined?

- asnaseer

thx for the link Limitless.

- asnaseer

sorry I meant:\[\log_p-(p)^6\]

- anonymous

In real yes.

- anonymous

hmm.. Good question. \(\log_{p}(-p^6)=\log_{p}(-1)+\log_{p}(p^6)=\log_{p}(-1)+6\) Here's an intuitive way of thinking: What in the world is \(\log_{p}(-1)\)???

- anonymous

I mean it is not defined in \( \mathbb{R}\)

- asnaseer

It always amazing me how even /seemingly/ simple problems can generate a whole raft of new learning! :)

- asnaseer

*amazes

- apoorvk

Yup^!

- anonymous

There is a tricky problem on this topic that I encountered last month,I will post it some time later.

- asnaseer

BTW: The wolf says \(\log(-1)=i\pi\)

- asnaseer

so FFM - you are right - it does not belong in the reals

- anonymous

You will find it very intriguing if you ask yourself why we restrict ourselves to certain domains on popular function. It taught me many deep ideas to ponder this. A rather elementary reason is that much of a function cannot even be graphed on a real 2-dimensional plane. Consider \(f(x)=x^2\) at \(x=i\). It is clear that we can graph \(f(i)=-1\), however how do we plot \(i\)??? This is where it becomes very intriguing: Complex numbers require special plotting techniques or special geometric spaces. :)

- asnaseer

You just melted by brain Limitless! (in a good way) :D

- anonymous

Well, I am glad I could! :) May someone more enlightened than me correct me if I am misrepresenting things.

- anonymous

How many values of \(x\) satisfy the equation \( \log (2x)=\frac 14 (x-15)^4 \)?

- lgbasallote

42 =_=

- asnaseer

Limitless: That little plotting problem you posed up there is indeed very intriguing. Looks like my weekend is going to be filled with reading material :)

- anonymous

Good lord, FFM. Surely this does not require numerical methods. D: I hope so, Asn. I had much spare time in class, LOL. You ask yourself questions like this out of boredom.

- anonymous

Well for complex numbers we need a completely new reference axes, The argand plane.

- anonymous

*plotting

- asnaseer

FFM: Can this be solved analytically?

- anonymous

Oh yes, 1 line if you start sufficiently from left ;)

- asnaseer

ah! - two values?

- anonymous

This whole factor \((x-15)^5\) is turning me off.

- anonymous

No. Btw consider \(\mathbb{R} \)

- asnaseer

I was thinking in \(\log(2x)\), 2x cannot be negative, therefore x must be positive. And I /assumed/ that \(\frac 14 (x-15)^4\) would have 2 negative and 2 positive solutions, so only 2 solutions possible.

- anonymous

\(x\) is not an integer. Is this true?

- anonymous

No.

- experimentX

\( \log(2x)^4 = (x-15)^4\)

- anonymous

I missed something, then.

- experimentX

|dw:1338633080637:dw|

- experimentX

can't find the solution analytically though!!

- asnaseer

that graph makes it look like there are indeed only 2 solutions

- anonymous

Which are symmetric.

- asnaseer

symmetric in which sense?

- experimentX

yes ... expoential function >> polynomial function >> log function

- anonymous

Oops. I was wrong, sorry.

- anonymous

Then the two solutions are x =? and x = ? .. :)

- experimentX

lol ... i hope you don't mind if i use guessing technique

- asnaseer

FFM: you are changing the goal posts here - your question was: How many values of x satisfy the equation...

- anonymous

Yes, but can't we find the solutions if there are two solutions?

- experimentX

i asked the same type of question of MSE they showed me Newton's method

- experimentX

lol :D

- anonymous

^yes.

- anonymous

Exact same experience. I don't even think Lambert W can be applied.

- asnaseer

is the log using base 10 or base e?

- anonymous

common logarithm base 10 I would say.

- anonymous

Well x=5 is the only solution. If you find the other one please let me know :)

- anonymous

\(x=5\) isn't a solution. Unless my math skills are horribly wrong right now.

- asnaseer

x=5 does not seem to satisfy the equation?

- asnaseer

this is the equation right?:\[\log (2x)=\frac 14 (x-15)^4\]

- anonymous

I just checked in mathematica: x = 5; 1/4 Log[10, (x - 15)^4] = Log [10, 2 x]=1

- anonymous

OMG!! I didn't mention the log carp :(

- experimentX

what am i getting?? http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+%28x-15%29%5E4+-+log%5B10%2C+%282x%29%5E4%5D+%3D+0

- anonymous

\[ \log (2x)=\frac 14 \log (x-15)^4 \]

- asnaseer

bad FFM - bad FFM - go stand in a corner now! :)

- anonymous

VERY VERY VERY poor penman ship :( My apologies to all :(

- anonymous

Whoa whoa whoa. One moment. Is this \(\log(x-15)^4\) or is it meant to be \(\log[(x-15)^4]\)?

- anonymous

I think both are same.

- anonymous

That implies \(x=-15\) is a solution.

- anonymous

No. that's the tricky part. Try substituting x=-15 in the equation.

- anonymous

So, probably not. But this is cool, so here you go: \(\log(2x)=\frac{1}{4}\log((x-15)^4)\) \(4\log(2x)=\log((x-15)^4)\) \(\log((2x)^4)=\log((x-15)^4)\) \(2x=x-15\) \(x=-15\)

- asnaseer

\[\log(2x)=\frac{1}{4}\log(x-15)^4\]therefore:\[\log(2x)^4=\log(x-15)^4\]\[(2x)^4=(x-15)^4\]\[2x=\pm(x-15)\]

- anonymous

Yes yes but as I said x=-15 is not a valid solution. Okay I am going to going to dig a hole and hide my face on it. I will see you guys later.

- asnaseer

therefore only ONE real solution, x=5

- anonymous

That's right asnaseer.!

- anonymous

Asnaseer has slain me. :p

- anonymous

I forgot, once again, the \(\pm\).

- asnaseer

:) we all have our days - in my case - seconds, of fame :)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.