Ace school

with brainly

  • Get help from millions of students
  • Learn from experts with step-by-step explanations
  • Level-up by helping others

A community for students.

-7+n/22=-1 Show steps? answers:-15 (its hard for me to show my work; cause i do it in my head.)

Mathematics
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SIGN UP FOR FREE
n/22 = 6 n = 6*22 = 132
no -15 is the answer
answer is not -15

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

it's not right
correct me if im wrong.
the answer should be 132 not -15
thats not even an option on my paper.
So the problem is wrong
\[\frac{-7+n}{22}\times22=-1\times22\]
@smr_kml You're reading the question wrong. The question is as Mertsj has written it. The answer is correct.
\[-7+n=-22\]
The steps are as follows: Multiply both sides by 22, then add seven to both sides.
\[-7+\frac{n}{22}=-1\] n/22 = -1 +7 n/22 = 6 n = 132
\[-7+n+7=-22+7\]
n=-15
The takeaway lesson from this, @staceyyyy1, is to use parentheses.
I got the same answer @JayDS
Of course you got the same answer, smr, you're both solving the same incorrect problem.
she has to put ( )
Ok I'm sorry I didn't know that it's seperate
Why doesn't the asker clarify??? We're more interested than the asker.
@smr_kml There is A RAT in sepARATe
To me it was plenty clarified by the fact that she said the answer was -15. However, she should in the future use parentheses for clarity.
right! I'm sorry again everyone!
thanks everyone. and thanks especially to Mertsj and nbouscal(:

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question