A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 4 years ago
which group of numbers are more numerous?
A. rational
B. irrational
anonymous
 4 years ago
which group of numbers are more numerous? A. rational B. irrational

This Question is Closed

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081129115431AAzAtYD

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0a theoretical question, i just want your insights!

alexwee123
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i would go w/ irrational cuz they are uncountably infinte

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Irrational. There are an infinite amount. For an example, consider 1.24 and 1.25 (completely random). There's 1.245 in between, amnd 1.246. Between those, there's 1.2455 and 1.2456. This goes on for \(\ \Huge \infty !\)

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yeah because between 1 and 2 there can be an infinite

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yeah, perhaps you're right! basing on grammar and language rule,. but i think in other sense, rational are more in number than irrational..

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0infinity times infinity is more than infinity

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think both are numerous. There's an infinite amount of rational numbers, and an infinite amount of irrational numbers. Both go \(\ \huge \rightarrow \infty . \)

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0\(\ \Huge \pm\infty that is \).

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0The answer is the irrational numbers. For some better understanding of why, you need to understand Cantor's work in the countability of infinite sets. The rationals are countably infinite; the irrationals are uncountably infinite.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Oh @nbouscal hit the spot!!

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Brief coverage of the notion of countability: A set is countably infinite if it can be put into a bijection with the natural numbers. If it cannot, then it is uncountably infinite. Cantor's proof of the uncountability of the reals is known as his diagonal argument, and is a very fun proof. There are a lot of resources available on the web for learning about and understanding this proof.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0our professor said, the answer is irrational.. but i hate to accept his, idea same as yours, by saying the difference in definition "countable and uncountable".

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Why do you hate to accept it? Have you seen and understood Cantor's diagonal argument? It is quite intuitive once you understand it.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0may i have the website of it?

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Here is a thread here on OS that may help you: http://openstudy.com/updates/4fc25b57e4b0964abc83b70b Here is Wikipedia on Cantor's diagonal argument: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor%27s_diagonal_argument Here is Professor Francis Su of Harvey Mudd giving a lecture on Countable and Uncountable Sets: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mciBPGCvpBk

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Uncountable is not at all synonymous to nonexistent, it is simply saying that you can't count them, for a specific definition of counting (bijection to the naturals).

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i'm not yet convinced. but, anyway, thanks for the ideas.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0If you are not yet convinced then you simply have not yet understood the argument :)

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i haven't read it yet! :)
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.