Callisto
  • Callisto
Tutor question #2 Factor: x^4 -7x^2 +1 (conditions: pen, paper, no calculator, done in 2 minutes) **
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
May be we can take x^2 as "t" & then factor
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
I mean\[(t^2-7t+1+5)-5\]
Callisto
  • Callisto
If my brain still works, Then it becomes (t-6)(t-1)-5 and then ..?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
I should learn this :/
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
ya it is not going to be factor like this:/ May be @satellite can help us:)
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
It's @satellite73
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
And he's offline
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
oops sorry lol
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
so we made only this much\[(x^2-6)(x^2-1)-5.\] now what should we do of {-5}?
Callisto
  • Callisto
I don't think we should do it in this way...
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
ya u r right @Callisto But I m thinking more on this.
anonymous
  • anonymous
you need to use synthetic division
Callisto
  • Callisto
@bronzegoddess Can you further explain it?
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
x^2-6 @ParthKohli
Callisto
  • Callisto
@ParthKohli It's not like that.... and you made mistakes there too...
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
I deleted it before you noticed :P
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
lol
Callisto
  • Callisto
I noticed before you deleted :P
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
ya i too
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
This degree 4 is eating my head >.<
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
I m feeling giddy too
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
@maheshmeghwal9 can you call Yogesh please?
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
but he is sitting aside of me
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
we 3 are all here:)
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Haha nice
anonymous
  • anonymous
okay, lets make a guess that (x-2) is a factor then we'll use synthetic division to actually se eif it one, its a trial and error method though: |dw:1339672516505:dw| so according to this division(x-2) isnt a factor because it gives us a remainder 11.
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
But my wolfy says (x^2 - 3x + 1)(x^2 + 3x + 1)
Callisto
  • Callisto
@bronzegoddess According to the word 'factor', I don't expect there is a remainder.
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
ya @Callisto is right: D
Callisto
  • Callisto
@ParthKohli I said no wolf. I got that answer from wolf too. But that doesn't help you solve it because you cannot use calculator. Just pen and paper
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
Hmm but I was telling bronzegoddess that this can be factored. I wanna understand too
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
LANA THE PROFESSOR :D
Callisto
  • Callisto
Not using synthetic division like that - yes :) Lana~~~~~~~~~~~~
anonymous
  • anonymous
@Callisto as I said it is a trail and error, and i was giving you an example, of course you have to start with finding the possible factors using descartes rule of signs!
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
We must want an exact & good method.
anonymous
  • anonymous
okay, let me do the whole thing again.
Callisto
  • Callisto
@bronzegoddess If the factor is 2 terms like ax+b, I can do it. But in this case, it's not. So I don't know how. If you don't mind, can you teach me how to reach that answer?
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
very good @ajprincess
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
but how did she know about adding -3x^3 & something other. I want to hear from her.
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
ya but if we didn't know the answer, then what to do It is the exact problem:/
ajprincess
  • ajprincess
ya will show that in a few minutes time.
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
hmm..
anonymous
  • anonymous
first: number of possible roots is 4 because of the degree. second Descartes' Rule: number of +real roots = 1or zero, and -real roots= 1 or zero, imaginary=2 or 4 third: what are the possible roots; constant term/leading coefficient so \[\pm1/\pm1\] therefore your 4 possible roots are -1,+1 and 2 imaginary numbers. fourth: synthetic division to see if -1 and +1 are actual roots; |dw:1339673466435:dw| but since it gives us a remainder then it isn't a factor(x+1) then you do the same with(x-1) and if it also give you a remainder then all your factors are imaginary. Thats how I learnt it.
Callisto
  • Callisto
Do you know when to use that method?
Callisto
  • Callisto
@bronzegoddess
ajprincess
  • ajprincess
we use trial and error method when we need to factorise expressions with greater power
anonymous
  • anonymous
when looking for factors or zeros of polynomials
Callisto
  • Callisto
@bronzegoddess please take a look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factor_theorem We can apply that method when one of the factors is in the form (x-k) Now, in this case, no factors are in the form (x-k). So, it cannot be applied in this case.
Callisto
  • Callisto
Of course you can keep using that method for checking, but you can't get a factor, I think.
anonymous
  • anonymous
@Callisto (x-k) aka (x-1)=0 is x=1 which you'll end up using as the divisor in synthetic division.
Callisto
  • Callisto
Okay, to be simple, if you can get a factor using that method, please tell me.
anonymous
  • anonymous
my step by step explanation from before doesn't make sense?
Callisto
  • Callisto
Sorry, to be honest, it makes no sense to me in this case. I truly understand that method and have been using to to solve more than 50 questions - at least. But in this case, I don't think it can help me get a factor. Sorry if I offend you. But please read the things I posted, and I hope you understand that.
Callisto
  • Callisto
And thank you for your time explaining that to me.
ajprincess
  • ajprincess
I agree @Callisto u cant get the answer in ths method. I tried with this method at first but didnt get the answr.
Callisto
  • Callisto
*have been using that method to solve. Typo. Sorry
anonymous
  • anonymous
Ah so you already know synthetic division, I am not offended at all. I just wished to help but unfortunately it's not working. Sorry for causing confusion then.
Callisto
  • Callisto
@bronzegoddess Thanks for your time spent here and willingness to help! I appreciate your efforts put here.
anonymous
  • anonymous
But there is of 4 factors: option1: 2 real(a+ and a -) and 2imaginary or option2: they are all imaginary isn't it?
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
Callisto
  • Callisto
I just need real factors. The expression can be factorised, according to wolf
ajprincess
  • ajprincess
this sorts of questions can be solved without using calculators only by splitting the terms and by adding and removng additional terms. we will knw which terms to add and remove nly by workng many more questions of this type. I dnt thnk there is a specific way to solve this as far as I knw.
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
Sorry about so long attachments
ParthKohli
  • ParthKohli
I'm astonished. A question that looks as easy as simple factorization is confusing the polymaths.
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
attachment is about factorizing:)
anonymous
  • anonymous
when you find an answer please do inform me :) thank you!
ajprincess
  • ajprincess
Bt seems so useful @maheshmeghwal9.
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
thanx:) @ajprincess
ajprincess
  • ajprincess
yw.:)
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
If u find answer @Callisto Plz inform me:)
experimentX
  • experimentX
The general way to solve quartic equation is to Ferrari's method http://www.proofwiki.org/wiki/Ferrari%27s_Method ... for this particular method, assuming it has two quadratic factors, \[ (x^2 + ax + b)(x^2 + cx +d) = x^4 - 7x^2 + 1 \\ \text{ or, } \\ x^4 + (a+c)x^3 + (b+d+ac)x^2 + (ad+bc)x + bd = x^4 - 7x^2 + 1 \\ \text{ Comparing coefficients } \\a+c = 0; \\b+d+ac=-7 \\ad+bc=0 \\ bd = 1 \] Now solving the values these equations we get the coefficients http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=c%2Ba%3D0%2Cb%2Bd%2Bac%3D-7%2Cad%2Bbc%3D0%2C+bd%3D1 Hence we have our quadratic factors http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=factorize+x^4+-+7x^2+%2B1 The other (numerical) method would be Newton's method http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_method The best rule would be to solve this type of equation simply is view analytically the function f(x) = x^4 -7x^2 + 1 eg, f(x) = x^4 +7x^2 +1 does not have any real solutions Besides Descartes's rule sign change and other techniques would be helpful if we were able to guess it's solution (using remainder theorem) then also we can easily factor out using synthetic division
anonymous
  • anonymous
@experimentX that was what i was saying all along :) is there a way to find the imaginary solutions then?
experimentX
  • experimentX
yes there is, Ferarri's method would be the general method ... check that link it finds out both real and imaginary roots ... (it's a lot messy though ... even for simple problems) Easy method is to reduce it into quadratic factors or, reduce into cubic (x-a)(x^3+bx^2+cx+d) = 0 and use Cardano's method <--- this is messy too (x^2+bx+c)(x^2+dx+e) = 0 <--- this is the best you can expect from that equation as you know the roots are imaginary if 4ac > b^2 for quadratic factors.
maheshmeghwal9
  • maheshmeghwal9
Hmm.... I heard of Ferrari today "A car also comes of help to maths{LOL}"
Callisto
  • Callisto
Thanks

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.