At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
Im pretty sure when a fetus touces the womb they get their individual prints
if im correct it is formed by the liquid while the fetus is in the womb
The DNA's are not EXACTLY the same so there are still some differences. Only clones are the same.
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
if i am not wrong, this case occurs rarelly.
Clones also have same exactly finger prints and identical twins in other words also can be said clones.
so the answer is that, not always there are same finger prints in identical twins. it might happen there difference there.
because nothing is 100% in this world. so things can be changed from regular sequnance.
they have same dna
Hi @Roger_Stone. @maxwellhas is right. It was previously thought that identical twins share identical DNA but it is not the case as depicted by some 'recent' findings.
This article is really interesting:
As far as the fingerprints are concerned, @bngaure and @precious_516 are right. You can check it out here:
I agree with mawellhas and Kayne - my understanding is that identical twins have identical finger prints.