anonymous
  • anonymous
LaTeX: Is there a macro for the curly inequality (like the ones used to represent partial orders)?
Mathematics
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
are you asking for a latex code? can you draw what the thing looks like?
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1340774266724:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
is it \(\le\)?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

zepp
  • zepp
That's \le
anonymous
  • anonymous
nope, a curly version of that
zepp
  • zepp
What do you mean by curly? D:
apoorvk
  • apoorvk
curly girly version? whazzat?? :O
anonymous
  • anonymous
does a symbol like that exist?
apoorvk
  • apoorvk
|dw:1340774404814:dw| This^? Nope -.-
anonymous
  • anonymous
in wikipedia it's \preccurlyeq, but it doesn't work on my latex compiler
anonymous
  • anonymous
\(\preccurlyeq\)?
zepp
  • zepp
\(\preccurlyeq\)?
zepp
  • zepp
Derp.
anonymous
  • anonymous
type in the equation editor \preccurlyeq
zepp
  • zepp
Simply type \~(\preccurlyeq\) but without the ~
apoorvk
  • apoorvk
Oh i see, well, I guess... it's not in the system here. a lot of other commands which the admins think unnecessary are not included/whatever.
anonymous
  • anonymous
@zepp that's what i'm looking for
anonymous
  • anonymous
where do they use that symbol?
apoorvk
  • apoorvk
\(\preccurlyeq\) ---> not working.
apoorvk
  • apoorvk
aaah it worked - *poker-faced*
apoorvk
  • apoorvk
WOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!
zepp
  • zepp
@apoorvk http://puu.sh/CsBF
zepp
  • zepp
:P
anonymous
  • anonymous
@abb50: partial order relations. I'm in a discrete math course. i'll try compiling it in latex again
apoorvk
  • apoorvk
@zepp http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lqnxrk6ERg1qhfn6b.jpg '__'
zepp
  • zepp
xD
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm getting an error "undefined control sequence" when I type "We first show that $(S,\preccurlyeq)$ is a poset:" I use TeXnicCenter by the way
zepp
  • zepp
\((s, \preccurlyeq)\)?
anonymous
  • anonymous
yes.
zepp
  • zepp
\~((S, \preccurlyeq)\) there, once again, without ~
anonymous
  • anonymous
do I put that between dollar signs? remove the dollar signs as well? either way I'm still getting errors..
zepp
  • zepp
\($(S,\preccurlyeq)$\) Like this?
zepp
  • zepp
\~($(S,\preccurlyeq)$\) without ~
anonymous
  • anonymous
not working out, sorry..
zepp
  • zepp
That's strange :|
zepp
  • zepp
http://puu.sh/DYxG
anonymous
  • anonymous
if I put a regular inequality sign it works fine though.. it's like my compiler doesn't recognize the macro for the curly inequality..
zepp
  • zepp
It doesn't work on OpenStudy?
anonymous
  • anonymous
no, in my compiler, TeXnicCenter.
zepp
  • zepp
I can't help you then D: Don't know what it is :(
anonymous
  • anonymous
That's alright.. thanks anyway.
zepp
  • zepp
Ok good :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
got it, i typed /preceq instead..
zepp
  • zepp
\(\preceq\) Lol :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
either one is fine.. i would have liked \preccurleq better though lol
zepp
  • zepp
They look quite similar, except the bar underneath :P
anonymous
  • anonymous
yeah. as long as it's curly i guess lol. i just don't want it to look like a regular inequality. haha

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.