Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

windsylph

  • 3 years ago

LaTeX: Is there a macro for the curly inequality (like the ones used to represent partial orders)?

  • This Question is Closed
  1. abb50
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    are you asking for a latex code? can you draw what the thing looks like?

  2. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1340774266724:dw|

  3. abb50
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    is it \(\le\)?

  4. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    That's \le

  5. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    nope, a curly version of that

  6. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    What do you mean by curly? D:

  7. apoorvk
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    curly girly version? whazzat?? :O

  8. abb50
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    does a symbol like that exist?

  9. apoorvk
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    |dw:1340774404814:dw| This^? Nope -.-

  10. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    in wikipedia it's \preccurlyeq, but it doesn't work on my latex compiler

  11. abb50
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \(\preccurlyeq\)?

  12. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    \(\preccurlyeq\)?

  13. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Derp.

  14. abb50
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    type in the equation editor \preccurlyeq

  15. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Simply type \~(\preccurlyeq\) but without the ~

  16. apoorvk
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Oh i see, well, I guess... it's not in the system here. a lot of other commands which the admins think unnecessary are not included/whatever.

  17. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @zepp that's what i'm looking for

  18. abb50
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    where do they use that symbol?

  19. apoorvk
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    \(\preccurlyeq\) ---> not working.

  20. apoorvk
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    aaah it worked - *poker-faced*

  21. apoorvk
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    WOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

  22. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @apoorvk http://puu.sh/CsBF

  23. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    :P

  24. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @abb50: partial order relations. I'm in a discrete math course. i'll try compiling it in latex again

  25. apoorvk
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @zepp http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lqnxrk6ERg1qhfn6b.jpg '__'

  26. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    xD

  27. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I'm getting an error "undefined control sequence" when I type "We first show that $(S,\preccurlyeq)$ is a poset:" I use TeXnicCenter by the way

  28. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    \((s, \preccurlyeq)\)?

  29. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes.

  30. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    \~((S, \preccurlyeq)\) there, once again, without ~

  31. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    do I put that between dollar signs? remove the dollar signs as well? either way I'm still getting errors..

  32. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    \($(S,\preccurlyeq)$\) Like this?

  33. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    \~($(S,\preccurlyeq)$\) without ~

  34. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    not working out, sorry..

  35. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    That's strange :|

  36. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    http://puu.sh/DYxG

  37. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    if I put a regular inequality sign it works fine though.. it's like my compiler doesn't recognize the macro for the curly inequality..

  38. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    It doesn't work on OpenStudy?

  39. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    no, in my compiler, TeXnicCenter.

  40. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I can't help you then D: Don't know what it is :(

  41. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    That's alright.. thanks anyway.

  42. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Ok good :)

  43. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    got it, i typed /preceq instead..

  44. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    \(\preceq\) Lol :)

  45. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    either one is fine.. i would have liked \preccurleq better though lol

  46. zepp
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    They look quite similar, except the bar underneath :P

  47. windsylph
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yeah. as long as it's curly i guess lol. i just don't want it to look like a regular inequality. haha

  48. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy