Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

meera_yadav

  • 2 years ago

How do we derive the expression for the potential due to a point charge at a distance r away from it (taking potential at infinity to be zero) ?

  • This Question is Closed
  1. quarkine
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    integrate the work done in bringing a unit charge from infinity to that point at distance r using coulomb's law

  2. meera_yadav
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    thanks quakine, but this is where i'm struck I take Q due to which i need to calculate potential at point A I bring a test charge from infinity to the point A without any acceleration ! we have \[w = \int\limits_{\infty}^{A}F.dl\] Here F is the external force that an external system applies to bring the test charge to A let the test charge be a unit positive test charge. the force F is equal and opposite to that of the force due to Q therefore I substitute F= -E { E is the electric field due to Q } therefore we've \[w = -\int\limits_{\infty}^{A}E.dl\] now I substitute for E due to Q , i.e\[E=Q/4\Pi \in0 r ^{2} \] direction of E is opposite to the displacement dl ! here's i'm struck !

  3. CarlosGP
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Just solve the integral and substitute the extreme values, taking into account that the value in infinite is zero. Some clue: the integral function of (1/r^2)dr is -1/r

  4. quarkine
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    there are two forces in action here,the electrostatic repulsion and your force which overcomes this repulsion and bring these two charges closer.due to the no acc condition both forces are equal and opposite. |dw:1246119205782:dw| F is the force you apply against F1 which is the electrostratic repulsion. hence F= -F1 as these two forces are opposite in direction but equal. Also, it is hard to know how much force you applied but it is easier to measure the repulsion.so F in the integral F.dl is Your force but we replace it by a minus F1. so the direction of dl and YOUR force are always same (towards Q) and work is positive. the minus before the integral of E.dl already takes care of sign (cos180 is -1)|dw:1246120234592:dw|. so you can forget about the minus sign and evaluate the integral as drawn.

  5. Vincent-Lyon.Fr
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \(\vec E=-\vec \nabla V= - \vec {grad}\:V\) So \(V(r)=-\int E(r) \,dr \) Take the primitive of KQ/r², change sing, then chose constant to be zero at infinity. The advantage of this method is that you do not need to refer to energy, neither to imagine a force counteracting the electrostatic force and working out the work done by this force.

  6. meera_yadav
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    thanks all :) quarkine, if I solve

  7. meera_yadav
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1340944945729:dw| i get finally \[-kQ/ra\] this is negative of what the answer is !

  8. meera_yadav
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    answer is KQ/r

  9. Vincent-Lyon.Fr
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Correct !

  10. meera_yadav
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    its coming out after solving integral (as can be seen above ) -kQ/r . let me know what's the flaw in the way i solved.

  11. quarkine
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    the minus sign is fine...it gets away when we exchange the upper and lower limit.. [it's a general property of definite integral] if u r nt familiar with that then just evaluate your integral ans with proper lmits..you will get the correct answer

  12. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.