Ace school

with brainly

  • Get help from millions of students
  • Learn from experts with step-by-step explanations
  • Level-up by helping others

A community for students.

How do we derive the expression for the potential due to a point charge at a distance r away from it (taking potential at infinity to be zero) ?

Physics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

integrate the work done in bringing a unit charge from infinity to that point at distance r using coulomb's law
thanks quakine, but this is where i'm struck I take Q due to which i need to calculate potential at point A I bring a test charge from infinity to the point A without any acceleration ! we have \[w = \int\limits_{\infty}^{A}F.dl\] Here F is the external force that an external system applies to bring the test charge to A let the test charge be a unit positive test charge. the force F is equal and opposite to that of the force due to Q therefore I substitute F= -E { E is the electric field due to Q } therefore we've \[w = -\int\limits_{\infty}^{A}E.dl\] now I substitute for E due to Q , i.e\[E=Q/4\Pi \in0 r ^{2} \] direction of E is opposite to the displacement dl ! here's i'm struck !
Just solve the integral and substitute the extreme values, taking into account that the value in infinite is zero. Some clue: the integral function of (1/r^2)dr is -1/r

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

there are two forces in action here,the electrostatic repulsion and your force which overcomes this repulsion and bring these two charges closer.due to the no acc condition both forces are equal and opposite. |dw:1246119205782:dw| F is the force you apply against F1 which is the electrostratic repulsion. hence F= -F1 as these two forces are opposite in direction but equal. Also, it is hard to know how much force you applied but it is easier to measure the repulsion.so F in the integral F.dl is Your force but we replace it by a minus F1. so the direction of dl and YOUR force are always same (towards Q) and work is positive. the minus before the integral of E.dl already takes care of sign (cos180 is -1)|dw:1246120234592:dw|. so you can forget about the minus sign and evaluate the integral as drawn.
\(\vec E=-\vec \nabla V= - \vec {grad}\:V\) So \(V(r)=-\int E(r) \,dr \) Take the primitive of KQ/r², change sing, then chose constant to be zero at infinity. The advantage of this method is that you do not need to refer to energy, neither to imagine a force counteracting the electrostatic force and working out the work done by this force.
thanks all :) quarkine, if I solve
|dw:1340944945729:dw| i get finally \[-kQ/ra\] this is negative of what the answer is !
answer is KQ/r
Correct !
its coming out after solving integral (as can be seen above ) -kQ/r . let me know what's the flaw in the way i solved.
the minus sign is fine...it gets away when we exchange the upper and lower limit.. [it's a general property of definite integral] if u r nt familiar with that then just evaluate your integral ans with proper lmits..you will get the correct answer

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question